Dr. Blue on Improving Myeloma Care for Black Patients
Interviewed by: Stephanie Chuang Edited by: Katrina Villareal and Chris Sanchez
Brandon Blue knew at a young age that he wanted to help people. Decades later, he’s done that and so much more, changing and saving the lives of people who’ve been diagnosed with cancer. Now known as Dr. Brandon Blue, he’s become a well-known hematologist-oncologist at Moffitt Cancer Center, a comprehensive cancer research center recognized by the National Cancer Institute.
In this story, learn key tips on how people can make a difference for themselves and their health, and regarding what can help save lives, specifically for his specialty: multiple myeloma, an illness that disproportionately impacts people in his own communities, including Black/African-Americans.
In fact, despite how busy Dr. Blue is as someone who does research and helps countless patients, he decided to join a group of patients, advocates, and other myeloma stakeholders for more than two years to collaborate on how to improve the care of underserved groups like Black/African-American multiple myeloma patients and their families. They put together a report that was selected for presentation at the largest gathering of top doctors and researchers in blood cancer called the American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting, a presentation led by a patient advocate named Oya Gilbert.
Watch this second episode of our series to hear about their top solutions on how to serve as many people as possible dealing with the hardships of a cancer diagnosis.
Thank you to Pfizer for supporting our patient education program. The Patient Story retains full editorial control over all content.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.
Whatever I do in life, it’s going to involve helping people.
My Path to Medicine
When I was a kid, I was always good at math and science. My mom always told me that if you get good grades, good things will happen. When I was a senior in high school, I wanted a senior ring, but we didn’t have the money for it. So my mom said, “Get a job, and then you can pay for it.” Right across the street from my house was a nursing home that had this big “Help Wanted” sign.
I went over there and asked if I could do any work for them. And they hired me right then and there. I realized I didn’t know what it meant to work in a nursing home. But it was fantastic for me because I got a chance to see people who needed a lot of help, and I realized, hey, I can help them. I worked in the kitchen, and my job was to deliver the food to the patients, so I didn’t help them medically, but I do think that I helped them in a way because I was very inquisitive.
So I’d always get in trouble for leaving the kitchen and going to talk to people. And I felt like I was drawn to people, and it was my chance to be able to talk to them. And that was my first glimpse of my mission. Whatever I do in life, it’s going to involve helping people.
In the nursing home, the holidays were a big deal. Unfortunately, families couldn’t come to visit many of the patients. I remember a lady with a terminal illness or condition. She didn’t have too long left to live, and her family wasn’t there during the holidays. So I knew that time spent with her meant the world to her because, sadly, that was probably her last Christmas. And so I decided I was going to sit with her for a little while. It was fantastic for her to spend time with someone again, especially during the holidays. That was something that I’ll never forget.
So, as a teenager, I decided that I wanted to help people, and I knew I was good at math and science. I thought, “Well, how can I put these together?” So, after high school, people started asking, “What are you going to do next?” And I thought, “Oh my gosh, they want me to have my life figured out at such an early age.” And so I responded, “I think a way that I can use my math and science skills to help people is to become a doctor.”
I knew nothing about being a doctor. But I had seen the doctors who were helping the people at the nursing home, and so that was how I first thought that I could do it, too. I didn’t know what it took, but at least that was my idea of what I wanted to do, even though I didn’t know what that path looked like.
I didn’t have any family members who were doctors. I didn’t have any guidance.
I saw my first Black/African-American doctor when I was in medical school. He was one of my teachers. For me, that was my first I-can-actually-do-this moment. It went from an abstract thought that I didn’t know how to actualize, to — this guy came from where I came from, and he talks like me, looks like me, and he’s making it. So maybe I can make it too.
I want to inspire people to say, “Hey, you go to school, you get good grades, and you can become a doctor.”
The Power of Realizing My Dreams
As much as I’m the first in my family to be a doctor, I want to make sure that I’m not the last. We have to make sure that we’re always giving back. And so a big thing for me is to make sure that other Dr. Brandon Blues are following behind me. If, when I was young, someone had been able to guide me and say, “This is the road, this is the path, this is how you do it,” then I might have avoided some of the pitfalls of youth. So that’s one of my main goals: to give back and help people.
I played a lot of basketball and football. For a lot of folks in my community, that was their way of making money. That’s what everyone thought. You play these sports, you excel at them, and that’s how you’re going to be successful in life. I want to inspire people to say, “Hey, you go to school, you get good grades, and you can become a doctor.” And that’s one of the aspirations that I want little kids to develop, instead of just football or basketball aspirations.
I connect with people in three places. The first is the community center. Kids go there after school to play basketball and do homework. I tell them, “I know you’re only in middle or high school, but let me tell you what the next ten years could look like if you take your math and science classes seriously.”
The second place is the barbershop. In the Black/African-American community, we trust our barbers. Plenty of conversations that happen there don’t happen anywhere else. I want to make sure that health care is discussed there, too. The third place is the church. That’s a cornerstone for minority communities. I want to make sure that, as much as people trust their faith leaders, they can also trust their doctors. I want to let people know that we only want to help.
People say, “I want a doctor who looks like me.” I have patients who drive from all over the country to see me. Unfortunately, there are not enough minority doctors. I do hope that that changes ten or 20 years from now. I know that the connections that I’ve made with my patients are priceless. And so I just want to make sure that I do the best thing for them and that people know that you can come from my community and still be successful.
The rate of having multiple myeloma is about twice as common in the Black/African-American community.
Multiple myeloma is a cancer that unfortunately needs heavy treatment, like chemotherapy, to help people get better. However, it’s not a curable disease, so it’s more of a lifelong illness.
Typically in medical textbooks, the average age of diagnosis for multiple myeloma is 69. For Hispanics, it’s 62. For Black/African-Americans, it’s 64. Why does that matter? Because when you go to the doctor complaining about certain symptoms, they’re looking for someone who is nearly 70 and you’re in your early 60s, they’ll say, “Oh, you couldn’t have that.” Unfortunately for the minority community, multiple myeloma is one of those things that we get at a younger age. Also, the rate of having multiple myeloma is about twice as common in the Black/African-American community.
Common Symptoms of Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma is a blood and bone marrow disorder. Unfortunately, it’s not something that you can touch. With other cancers, there might be a lump or something that you can see, like blood in the stool. But because this deals with the blood and bone marrow, it happens on the inside.
The main symptoms that people will feel would be sudden things like back pain because as that marrow fills up with cancer, bones sometimes fracture and break. Another thing that can happen is it can overload the kidneys, so the kidneys shut down or there may be changes in the urine. But a lot of times, that happens when the cancer is very advanced.
We have all the greatest minds from around the world sitting down together and trying to figure out how to cure cancer and make things better for people.
Screening for Multiple Myeloma
Early detection saves your life down the road. If we can detect multiple myeloma before the symptoms kick in, then we prevent lifelong worry and hurt. How can people do that? How can they screen for multiple myeloma?
There is an important research study that I would love everyone to participate in. The PROMISE study is meant for early detection of multiple myeloma and its precursor called MGUS (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance). If you are 30 years old, live in the United States, and are Black/African-American, or have a family member with either multiple myeloma or MGUS, then you can get tested for free.
The big thing about cancer care and health care in general is that we want to be doing something better next year, or in ten years, than how we’re doing now. The only way that that happens is through research — knowing what everybody else around the world is doing and putting our minds together and saying, if that’s working, let’s take that forward.
Turning Conversation Into Action: A Collaborative Approach to Health Equity Solutions
That’s what I would say is happening here. We have all the greatest minds from around the world sitting down together and trying to figure out how to cure cancer and make things better for people. And that’s something I’m happy to be involved in. They might say, for example, African Americans have a higher rate of getting cancer (myeloma) or they might get diagnosed at an earlier age (64 versus 69). This is exactly why this research is a little bit different from anything else because we talked about the problems and we also talked about actionable steps to make things better for people starting on day one.
There were so many different people at the table, each person with their role in making things better. We can’t put this all on just the doctors or just the patients and say, well, if the doctors or the patients did this, then things would be better. It took a whole village. I think that’s the real key to the solution. I think that everyone was trying to do things their own way — the different groups each had a plan, but they weren’t all talking. So this is how we put everybody together to work together and make it better. It’s an awesome collaboration.
Years ago, cancer was a death sentence. Thanks to all the innovations, that is no longer true.
My Recommendations for Patients and Care Partners
If I had to choose one actionable step, it would be for people to get second opinions. Patients didn’t know that once they get diagnosed with cancer, they can come to an expert like myself and see if what their doctor is doing is the right thing. That’s important because there can be so many quick advancements in medicine. If your doctor is still doing things from last year or from two years ago, you might not be getting the best care. So it would be a game changer if everyone got a second opinion.
One of the important things for me is not letting cancer define people’s lives. Yes, you are a person with cancer, but you’re much more than that. I have a patient who wanted to make sure that she saw her daughter graduate from high school. One of the biggest advances that we’ve had for the cancer of multiple myeloma is called CAR T-cell therapy. Not only was that lady able to see her daughter finish high school, but she’s also now about to see her daughter graduate from college. She might not have been able to do so without some of these advancements that we’re talking about at these conferences.
Years ago, cancer was a death sentence. Thanks to all the innovations, that is no longer true. As a doctor, I try to make sure that these innovations are available to my patients and that I’m doing the right thing.
I remember a patient with severe cancer who wasn’t highly educated and didn’t understand how severe his cancer was because it wasn’t something he could touch, but he just knew that he felt bad. We tried so many different types of treatment, but unfortunately, his cancer was just too advanced. To this day, that’s something that just eats at me, if we had gotten him earlier and treated him earlier, maybe he would still be here today.
My father had a blood disorder known as diffuse large B cell lymphoma, which is a cancer that affects the lymph nodes. I’m happy to say that after two years, he’s in complete remission. He has a special IV called a port, and he gets to take his port out. Of course, he’s very happy about that. I’m happy to be involved in it because I am a cancer doctor who specializes in blood cancer. I can be a part of his journey, not only from a doctor’s side but as a son. I can educate people and say, “I know what it’s like to be a caregiver. I know what it’s like to have a family member with this cancer, and I never wish that upon anyone.” But if you do have it, just know that I’ve been able to walk a mile in your shoes.
Special thanks again to Pfizer for supporting our patient education program. The Patient Story retains full editorial control over all content
Oya Gilbert had always been full of energy. A father, a hip-hop lover, and a man who rarely got sick. But in 2015, his body started sending him signals he couldn’t ignore. But for two years, doctors dismissed his symptoms as anxiety. Watch Oya’s story from misdiagnosis to myeloma advocacy.
Symptom: None; found through blood tests Treatments: Total Therapy Four, carfilzomib + pomalidomide, daratumumab + lenalidomide, CAR T-cell therapy, selinexor-carfilzomib
Stage 4 Colon Cancer at 36: Kasey Shares Why Early Screening Can Save Lives
Kasey’s world changed when she was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer. In March 2024, her cancer was initially diagnosed as stage 2A, but by October, it had metastasized. It was unexpected and unnerving, something she never thought she’d have to face at 36 years old. Yet, through it all, Kasey fought to stay informed, advocate for herself, and share her story to help others recognize symptoms and push for the care they deserve.
Interviewed by: Taylor Scheib Edited by: Katrina Villareal
Kasey’s first symptoms started in 2021 after giving birth to her third son. She experienced extreme abdominal cramping, which she initially thought was hormonal. By 2023, the pain persisted and she sought answers from her primary care doctor. The road to her stage 4 colon cancer diagnosis wasn’t straightforward — Kasey’s symptoms were attributed to various conditions, including Hashimoto’s disease and guttate psoriasis. Despite dietary changes and lifestyle adjustments, new symptoms emerged, including mucus in her stool and, eventually, rectal bleeding. Even then, the doctors dismissed her concerns and delayed her colonoscopy for nine weeks. When she finally had the procedure in February 2024, doctors found a large mass. Almost immediately, they told her that it was cancer.
She underwent surgery in March, during which the surgeon removed 55% of her colon. While her lymph nodes tested negative, Kasey knew she had to make tough treatment decisions. Her doctor recommended the Signatera test, which checks for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). It came back negative, leading her doctors to advise against chemotherapy. But life threw another curveball — by July, Kasey discovered she was pregnant. A routine blood test revealed skyrocketing CEA levels, a marker for cancer. Heartbreakingly, she had to make the devastating choice to terminate her pregnancy to ensure she could monitor and treat her cancer. In September, scans confirmed progression to stage 4 colon cancer.
Since then, Kasey has been undergoing chemotherapy while maintaining her career, caring for her family, and finding strength in her faith. She has learned the importance of self-advocacy, pushing for screenings, and questioning medical assumptions. Through social media, she shares tips and insights on navigating treatment for stage 4 colon cancer, hoping to educate and empower others.
Kasey’s message is clear: cancer doesn’t define her. It’s a challenge, but it doesn’t mean that life stops. She wants people to understand that stage 4 colon cancer doesn’t always mean the worst, that community and support make a difference, and that listening to your body and pushing for answers can be lifesaving. Her story isn’t just about illness — it’s about resilience, awareness, and the power of taking control of your health.
Watch Kasey’s story to find out more about:
How a delayed colonoscopy changed everything — why early screenings are crucial.
How Kasey fought for answers when doctors dismissed her symptoms.
The emotional and medical challenges of pregnancy after a cancer diagnosis.
Why self-advocacy is key: “If I hadn’t pushed, I wouldn’t be here.”
The surprising lessons cancer taught her about life, family, and faith.
Name: Kasey S.
Age at Diagnosis:
36
Diagnosis:
Colon Cancer
Staging:
Stage 2A in March 2024, which metastasized to stage 4 in October 2024
Symptoms:
Extreme abdominal cramping
Mucus in stool
Rectal bleeding
Black stool
Fatigue
Weight fluctuations
Skin issues: guttate psoriasis
Treatments:
Surgery: Colectomy: removed 55% of right & transverse colon; salpingectomy: tubal removal
Chemotherapy
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.
Facing Cancer as a Young Mom: Melanie’s Stage 4 Nasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Story
Despite the excitement of expecting her first child, Melanie faced a life-altering diagnosis at 30 weeks pregnant: nasal squamous cell carcinoma. Her symptoms began subtly, with nosebleeds, sinus pressure, and congestion, all of which she attributed to pregnancy. However, when Melanie’s left eye started to protrude, she sought medical attention. An ENT attempted to examine her nasal cavity but found a mass blocking the scope. Urged to seek emergency care, she underwent an MRI and biopsy, confirming the presence of cancer.
The stage 4 nasal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis brought overwhelming fear and uncertainty. Melanie worried about being there for her child and the possibility of someone else raising her. She had to make treatment decisions quickly. Because the tumor had grown into critical areas, immediate surgery was not an option. Instead, doctors recommended chemotherapy, which she would begin after giving birth. Melanie’s hopes for a natural birth shifted when complications led to an emergency C-section. The moment her daughter was born brought a mix of relief and profound love. She held her baby for a day before beginning chemotherapy in the hospital.
Chemotherapy provided initial success, shrinking the tumor in her nasal cavity and allowing Melanie to breathe more easily. However, the tumor in her eye orbit remained unchanged due to poor blood flow in that area. With no clear margins for radiation, doctors advised surgical removal of her left eye and surrounding structures before proceeding with further treatment. The first surgery replaced lost tissue using a skin flap from her arm, followed by radiation therapy. Radiation, unexpectedly, was more physically challenging than chemotherapy, leaving her exhausted and struggling to eat. Despite this, she avoided a feeding tube and completed treatment.
Beyond the physical toll, cancer reshaped Melanie’s mental and emotional well-being. The loss of breastfeeding and the shift in parental roles meant that her husband had to take on responsibilities that they hadn’t anticipated. He became the primary caregiver, ensuring she had the rest needed for recovery. Melanie found solace in therapy, initially struggling to connect with traditional therapists who lacked medical experience. A hospital-based therapist and support groups provided better understanding, though finding peers in similar circumstances proved difficult due to her young age.
Motherhood took an unexpected form, but Melanie embraced every moment with gratitude. Nasal squamous cell carcinoma altered her body, but she is focused on regaining strength and adjusting to her new normal. Regular check-ups and hyperbaric oxygen therapy support her ongoing healing. Though life will be different, Melanie remains hopeful, emphasizing that even in the darkest moments, happiness can be found. Her experience underscores the importance of mental health support, a strong community, and finding purpose beyond the diagnosis.
Name: Melanie S.
Diagnosis:
Nasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Staging:
Stage 4
Mutation:
p16 positive (HPV-related)
Symptoms:
Nosebleeds
Sinus pressure
Congestion
Eye protrusion
Treatments:
Chemotherapy
Surgeries: orbital exenteration (left eye removal) & reconstructive flap surgery
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.
Symptoms: Sore on the tongue, which caused pain during eating and speaking; changes in the color and texture of the tissue where the sore was located Treatments: Surgery (partial glossectomy, radical neck dissection, reconstruction), radiation ...
Why Getting a Second Opinion Changed Joel’s Grade 2 Myxofibrosarcoma Treatment Plan
Joel has always valued family, faith, and community. Married for 31 years with a daughter and several foster children, he never imagined cancer would be part of his life. However, in a life-changing moment, in December 2024, at age 57, he was diagnosed with a grade 2 myxofibrosarcoma, a rare soft tissue cancer.
A small lump on his shin seemed minor at first, and he initially dismissed it as a fatty growth. However, over several months, it grew larger, prompting him to visit his doctor. As a precaution, though the doctor believed it was likely benign, they ordered tests to rule out any serious issues. An ultrasound came back inconclusive, leading to an MRI, which heightened concerns. Seeking a second opinion, Joel consulted a friend who connected him with a sarcoma specialist at the University of Iowa. Within hours, Joel received a call confirming that he had myxofibrosarcoma.
The uncertainty of his diagnosis was overwhelming. Not knowing whether he had months or years left to live was a heavy burden. However, after a biopsy confirmed it was grade 2 myxofibrosarcoma and contained, he felt a sense of relief. His doctor reassured him that they could treat his condition and manage it if it recurred.
Joel’s grade 2 myxofibrosarcoma treatment plan consists of radiation therapy, which he undergoes daily for a few minutes. Though he hasn’t experienced significant side effects yet, doctors have advised him that he may develop skin irritation in later weeks. After radiation, surgeons will remove the tumor and perform a skin graft and muscle repositioning to help the area heal properly.
Despite these medical interventions, Joel remains physically strong, continuing his workouts and daily routine without pain. Emotionally, Joel finds strength in his faith, family, and supportive community. His wife has been his rock and his close-knit group of friends offers him unwavering encouragement. His belief in God provides reassurance, removing the fear of death and allowing him to focus on living fully.
Beyond his experience with grade 2 myxofibrosarcoma, Joel emphasizes the importance of seeking medical advice early, especially for men who often downplay health concerns. He considers how his initial reluctance to get checked could have caused worse outcomes. Now, he encourages others to listen to their bodies and take proactive steps.
His outlook on life has shifted, centering on gratitude and using his experience to uplift others. He firmly believes in leveraging crises to bring awareness, comfort, and inspiration to those in need, rather than letting them go to waste. Instead of letting cancer define him, Joel is choosing to make a difference, reminding others that hope and purpose can thrive even in the face of adversity.
Name:
Joel S.
Age at Diagnosis:
57
Diagnosis:
Myxofibrosarcoma
Grade:
Grade 2
Symptom:
Lump on shin (gradual growth over several months)
Treatments:
Radiation therapy
Surgery: tumor removal & reconstruction of affected area
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.
Symptoms: Pain behind left knee, needle-like sensation in left foot Treatments: Surgery to remove what was thought to be benign tumor, chemotherapy, final surgery, radiation (36 sessions) ...
Navigating Waldenström’s: Getting the Best Care Close to Home
Unlock Better Waldenström’s Care – Right in Your Community!
Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) patient advocate Pete DeNardis, expert hematologist Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy, and practice administrator Maria Lamantia discuss the latest in community-based cancer care, personalized treatment options, and effective communication strategies.
Whether you’re newly diagnosed with WM or managing ongoing treatment, learn how to optimize your care, navigate “watch and wait,” and access clinical trials without leaving your local support network.
Navigating Waldenströms: Getting the Best Care Close to Home
Hosted by The Patient Story
Join WM patient advocate Pete DeNardis and expert hematologist Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy as they discuss the latest in community-based cancer care, personalized treatment options, and effective communication strategies.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider for treatment decisions.
Thank you to Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, for its support of our patient education program. The Patient Story retains full editorial control over all content.
Stephanie Chuang: We know most Americans are getting their cancer care at their local hospital or clinic and not at the large academic institutions, maybe not regularly or not even at all. But you may also hear that for blood cancers like Waldenström’s, it’s important to see a specialist. What does this mean and how can patients and their care partners successfully get the best care?
I’m the founder of The Patient Story. I was diagnosed with a different kind of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. When I was getting my 600-plus hours of chemoimmunotherapy, the idea came up: how can we help cancer patients and care partners navigate life at and after diagnosis? That’s what The Patient Story focuses on.
The LLS offers free resources like its Information Specialists, who are one free call away for support in different areas of blood cancer. The IWMF offers many support resources specifically for the Waldenström’s community, including dozens of in-person support groups around the world in addition to so many that are happening online.
We also want to thank our sponsor, Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, for its support, which truly helps us to host more of these programs for free to our audience. I want to stress that The Patient Story retains full editorial control over all content as always. While we hope that this is helpful, keep in mind this is not a substitute for medical advice, so still consult with your own team about your decisions.
This is sure to be an incredible discussion led by friend of The Patient Story and long-time advocate with the IWMF, Pete DeNardis.
Pete DeNardis: I’m chair emeritus of the International Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia Foundation and a long-time volunteer for the organization. I’m a patient myself, was diagnosed in October 2003, and have had multiple periods of treatment and watch-and-wait status over the years. My treatment has included chemotherapy, radiation, monoclonal antibodies, and targeted therapies. Most recently, my WM has been behaving itself.
I live in Pennsylvania and my care is directed by a hematologist at a cancer teaching hospital. Over the years, I have had overnight stays in a university-based hospital and at local community hospitals in emergency situations. I will be joined by Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy and Maria Lamantia.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy: I’m a clinical assistant professor with RWJBarnabas Health and the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey. I’m a hematologist specializing in blood cancers.
My role is interesting. I work out of a community-based setting but in close partnership with our academic center, the Rutgers Cancer Institute, which gives me a very different perspective on treating patients. I have many patients with Waldenström’s and other conditions, and I’m thankful to be here to talk more about that.
Maria Lamantia: I’m so happy to work alongside Dr. Eltoukhy. We work together as a team. We have a wonderful staff and we treat our patients like family. Working alongside Dr. Eltoukhy, I see him take the time with his patients to answer all of their questions. We treat them emotionally and physically, so we need to treat them as a whole.
Pete: That’s fantastic. Patients need to have a good relationship with their healthcare professionals, especially for people with rare cancers like Waldenström’s, and to have a very caring and a very productive relationship. It sounds like you’re doing a fantastic job.
The Most Common First Symptoms of Waldenström’s
Pete: We want to get your perspective on how you approach Waldenström’s patients. Dr. Eltoukhy, can you describe the typical diagnostic journey for a patient with WM? What are the initial symptoms you usually see? Do you run certain tests when a patient comes in?
Dr. Eltoukhy: The diagnostic journey for a patient with Waldenström’s often can be prolonged because the initial symptoms are quite nonspecific and can mimic other conditions. The most common symptoms patients report are fatigue and weakness, which are most often due to anemia. Some patients may also experience unintentional weight loss, night sweats, and peripheral neuropathy, which presents as numbness or tingling in the hands and feet. In more advanced cases, symptoms related to hyperviscosity, like headaches, blurred vision, dizziness, or even nosebleeds may develop.
Common Steps to Diagnose Waldenström’s
Dr. Eltoukhy: The diagnostic approach typically starts with a thorough history and physical exam, which is critical for identifying patterns of symptoms and any physical signs, like enlarged lymph nodes or spleen. From there, blood tests are usually the first step. A complete blood count might show anemia and serum protein electrophoresis can detect a monoclonal IgM protein, which is characteristic of Waldenström’s. Further testing with immunofixation and serum viscosity levels can provide more details.
Once Waldenström’s is suspected, a bone marrow biopsy is essential to confirm the diagnosis. It will show the infiltration of lymphoplasmacytic cells. The bone marrow can be tested for other things, like the MYD88 mutation, which is present in over 90% of Waldenström’s cases. Imaging studies like CT scans can be useful in assessing lymph node or organ involvement.
Diagnosing Waldenström’s requires piecing together clinical signs, lab results, and histologic findings. Because the symptoms can be subtle or overlap with other conditions, taking a comprehensive history and performing a thorough physical exam is foundational in guiding the diagnostic workup.
How to Communicate with Your Primary Care Physician the Need to See a Specialist
Pete: I can tell by your response that you have a lot of experience with Waldenström’s patients. You’re hitting all the high notes and the critical aspects of diagnosing someone with Waldenström’s. Sometimes the symptoms manifest over a longer time.
I had classic symptoms, but I didn’t realize it then. I kept on thinking it was something else and waited a long time before I saw my doctor. How can a patient best communicate their concerns to their primary care physician to ensure a timely referral to a specialist? How do we get people to understand that we should take this to the next level in terms of testing and analysis of what’s going on?
If something feels off… it’s crucial to report these symptoms accurately and thoroughly.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Dr. Eltoukhy: Interestingly, that happens a lot. When it comes to ensuring a timely referral to a specialist, one of the most important things patients can do is to be clear and proactive in communicating their concerns. First and foremost, patients should be their own advocates. If something feels off — like you’re having persistent fatigue, unexplained weight loss, night sweats, or any unusual symptoms such as numbness or frequent infections — it’s crucial to report these symptoms accurately and thoroughly. Even if the symptoms seem minor or unrelated, sharing the full picture helps the physician connect the dots.
It’s also helpful for patients to record their symptoms: noting when they started, how often they occur, and whether they’re getting worse over time. This level of detail provides valuable context that can prompt a physician to dig deeper and consider a hematologic cause like Waldenström’s.
In addition, there should be no hesitation to express concerns directly. If they feel their symptoms are not improving or are being overlooked, it’s perfectly appropriate to ask, “Could this be something more serious? Do you think I should see a specialist?” Open and honest communication ensures the primary care physician fully understands the patient’s level of concern and can make an informed decision about referring them to a hematologist. Ultimately, while I know that physicians play a key role in guiding care, patients who actively engage in the process and advocate for themselves help ensure timely, appropriate evaluations.
Deciding Whether to Go to an Academic/Research Center or Community Hospital
Pete: In many cases, an important aspect of receiving treatment is where you get treatment. Of course, what determines that could be where you’re located and what type of services are available to you. This brings up the conversation of cancer care in a community setting or a suburban/rural setting. What’s the difference between a community hospital versus an academic center or a cancer hospital? How can people best understand the difference between them? If it does make a difference, how do they know which one to go to?
Dr. Eltoukhy: When we talk about cancer care in general, especially for rare diseases like Waldenström’s, the setting where a patient receives treatment can be as important as the treatment itself. Broadly speaking, there are key differences between community hospitals and academic medical centers or more specialized cancer centers.
By design, community hospitals are designed to provide general health care services to the local population. They offer a wide range of medical care, from routine checkups to managing common conditions and even some cancers. The care teams in these settings are skilled at treating a broad spectrum of diseases. For patients with more common or straightforward cases, community hospitals are convenient and provide excellent care close to home. Accessibility is a big advantage because patients don’t have to travel far. They also often have a more personalized relationship with their care team.
On the other hand, academic medical centers and specialized cancer hospitals focus heavily on research, teaching, and clinical trials, so these centers are often affiliated with medical schools and are involved in clinical trials, so they’re at the forefront of new treatments and therapies. Patients treated at these centers may have access to novel therapies that aren’t widely available in the community setting. Additionally, these institutions have multidisciplinary teams, which include hematologists, pathologists, and other specialists who focus specifically on rare cancers providing a more specialized approach.
In terms of the patient population, your typical community hospital will manage more common cancers and straightforward cases, while academic centers are more in tune to see more complex, rare, or treatment-resistant cases. However, this does not mean that community hospitals cannot manage diseases like Waldenström’s effectively. Many do, such as ours, especially with proper collaboration and referral pathways.
Ultimately, the best approach may involve a balance between the two settings. Patients might receive specialized consultation at an academic center while continuing their routine care and follow-ups in the community, ensuring both accessibility and cutting-edge treatment options.
Stephanie: Dr. Eltoukhy, I want to jump in very quickly as we have two patient perspectives about how they were able to figure out the best Waldenström’s care for themselves. Annmarie was diagnosed a few years ago and heard right away to see a specialist. Bob, on the other hand, was diagnosed in 1997, which was a very different time, and says the IWMF was instrumental in helping him link between a local care team and a specialist. Bob, what was it like trying to figure out your care almost three decades ago?
Bob B.: First of all, my local oncologist didn’t know about how I should be treated. With IWMF, we were able to get Arnie’s advice. There was some research going on at Scripps, MD Anderson, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, and a couple of others. We visited a few places to go through the discovery of what might seem to make the most sense to be treated, bring that information back to my local oncologist, and allow him to be my quarterback.
Annmarie S.: If you’re lucky enough to go to a place with specialized care, that’s crucial in terms of them understanding the disease, diagnosis, different treatments, what future treatments can look like, research, and all the positivity that comes along with that. What’s challenging with Waldenström’s is general practitioners and hematologists don’t understand what it’s all about in terms of care and the next level of getting treatment, so they look at it more broadly as a cancer.
When you go to the next level and get a Waldenström’s specialist, they treat it more as disease management if you will. A lot of times, people cannot do that. Sometimes people are comfortable with the practitioner that they have. Utilize a facility that treats Waldenström’s and if you have to use your primary care physician or a general hematologist, have a Waldenström’s team as part of your overall treatment plan.
The Biggest Challenge for Waldenström’s Patients Who Get Community Care
Pete: In my situation, I go to a local university-based hospital because it’s as convenient as going to a community hospital. My condition is a little unusual even among rare cancer patients. What would you consider is the biggest challenge to providing cancer care in a local community setting, like in a rural setting?
Dr. Eltoukhy: One of the biggest challenges in providing cancer care in the local community setting comes down to the availability of resources. It’s not about the knowledge or expertise. We have highly skilled specialists dedicated to treating complex conditions like Waldenström’s. The challenge lies more in the infrastructure and support systems compared to larger cancer centers.
For example, while I can offer phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in my community practice, phase 1 trials, which are often the first step in introducing new therapies, typically require more specialized resources and are more readily available at larger academic or dedicated cancer centers. This includes specialized monitoring, regulatory oversight, and more intensive support systems.
Another significant factor is personnel. Larger cancer centers tend to have extensive multidisciplinary teams with dedicated staff for clinical trials, patient navigation, and supportive care services. In the community setting, we operate with leaner teams, so it can be more challenging to coordinate the logistics of complex care or get patients enrolled in trials as quickly as we’d like.
One of the biggest challenges in providing cancer care in the local community setting comes down to the availability of resources… It’s not that care is any less thorough, but the resources to streamline and support those processes are more limited.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
It’s not that care is any less thorough, but the resources to streamline and support those processes are more limited. That said, working closely with the cancer center, as I do, helps bridge some of those gaps. We can offer high-quality, specialized care locally while collaborating with larger institutions to ensure patients have access to the full spectrum of treatment options when needed. The goal is always to deliver the best possible care, whether it’s in the community or at a specialized center.
Pete: That’s great. I like how you touched on clinical trials. We try to encourage patients in the Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia community to seek out clinical trials whenever they can. It’s good to know that even in a community hospital setting, patients can participate in a clinical trial.
Referring Waldenström’s Patients to an Academic Center
Pete: From a community setting, collaboration is important with larger hospitals when the need arises. Are there circumstances where you refer your patients to a larger center or to another hospital setting where there are more people with more extensive knowledge or more facilities that can tend to their particular circumstances?
Dr. Eltoukhy: Yes. As a blood cancer specialist practicing in a community setting, I feel fully confident managing a wide range of hematological malignancies, including Waldenström’s. My knowledge and expertise are not limiting factors when it comes to providing high-quality care for these patients. However, collaboration with our main cancer center and other academic institutions is vital to ensuring patients have access to the full spectrum of treatment options when needed.
Typically, there are two main circumstances where I would refer a patient to a larger center. The first is when additional resources or specialized support are necessary. For example, if there’s a clinical trial, particularly an early phase trial, that could offer a promising new therapy not available in our community setting, I would absolutely refer a patient to take advantage of that opportunity. While we do offer phase 2 and 3 trials locally, phase 1 trials are very specialized research protocols usually housed in these larger academic centers with the infrastructure to support them.
The second scenario involves treatments that require specialized procedures we don’t currently offer at our center. While this isn’t specific to Waldenström’s, right now, therapies like bone marrow transplants or CAR T-cell therapy are examples of advanced treatments that require more dedicated facilities and more specialized teams with highly specific protocols. These are scenarios where I would refer to the academic center.
Referrals are part of a collaborative approach… This partnership allows patients to receive cutting-edge treatments without losing the personalized, accessible care they value in the community.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
That said, these referrals are part of a collaborative approach, so even when a patient is referred out for a specific treatment or trial, I remain closely involved in their care, coordinating with the academic center to ensure a smooth transition and continuity of care when they return to the community setting for a follow-up. This partnership allows patients to receive cutting-edge treatments without losing the personalized, accessible care they value in the community.
Referring Waldenström’s Patients to Another Specialist for a Second Opinion
Pete: In line with that, the IWMF provides a list of several dozens of doctors who are considered second-opinion doctors because perhaps they work at an institution that focuses solely on Waldenström’s, like Dana-Farber Cancer Institute or Mayo Clinic. Have you ever referred a patient for a second opinion because their situation is so unusual? And is that a common practice?
Dr. Eltoukhy: Yes, that is. Typically in the community, a lot of oncologists would be what we consider generalists, which means they treat a lot of different conditions. The referral basis for these doctors would be a lot more than me. Being a blood cancer specialist, while I don’t do it as often as I would if I was a generalist, I absolutely do on a regular basis. These come back to the patients who are treatment-resistant or unusual cases when we send out pathology and the pathology comes back blurring the lines between two different diseases, which happens quite often in blood cancers.
In our center at least, I collaborate very closely with the Rutgers Cancer Institute. We have combined tumor boards and I will refer patients. For most patients, first-line treatment will be the standard of care. No matter where you go, there’s somewhat of an agreement about what the standard of care would be.
Once you get to the second, third, fourth, fifth, and so on lines of treatment, that’s when I in the community setting or other doctors in an academic center usually go to other colleagues to get their opinion. Seeing me in the community doesn’t mean you don’t get the opinions of the other doctors in the academic center. I’m always presenting on these two boards, sharing the cases, and getting other doctors opinions. This shouldn’t be an ego thing. It’s more about giving the best care possible to the patients.
Pete: I can tell by your responses that you obviously are a doctor who has the needs and the health of the patient as the number one priority and I commend you for that.
What Waldenström’s Patients Should Consider in Choosing a Community Hospital or Provider
Pete: For patients who don’t require specialized care, can you describe how going to a community hospital could be in their best interest and benefit them?
Dr. Eltoukhy: There is a common misconception that community cancer care isn’t as high quality as what you’d find at a larger academic center, but that’s simply not true. For many patients who don’t require highly specialized treatments, receiving care in a community setting can offer distinct advantages without compromising the quality of care.
First and foremost, being treated closer to home means patients are in a familiar environment surrounded by their support system, such as family, friends, and their local community. That comfort can play a huge role in how patients cope with a cancer diagnosis and treatment. It feels like you’re in your own backyard, which can make the entire experience less overwhelming. But it’s not just about convenience.
Our community cancer center is equipped with a multidisciplinary team, which is essential for providing comprehensive care. We have radiation oncologists, surgical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and medical hematologist-oncologists all working together. We regularly hold tumor boards where complex cases are discussed collaboratively, ensuring that multiple expert opinions shape each patient’s care plan.
For disease sites where we may not have a dedicated tumor board locally, we seamlessly collaborate with our main cancer center to ensure every patient benefits from the collective expertise. Even though patients are receiving care in a local familiar setting, they’re still getting the benefit of a specialized collaborative treatment. It’s not one doctor in isolation. It’s a coordinated team effort to provide the best possible outcomes. For many patients, this combination of high-quality care and the comfort of being treated closer to home is honestly the ideal scenario.
Maria: We offer also procedures in the clinic setting for those who are a little frightened to be in a hospital setting, like bone marrow biopsies. We have very skilled, qualified staff to assist Dr. Eltoukhy and we’re able to do those right in an office setting, which is helpful for patients who have that fear of going to the hospital.
We’re conveniently located right on the same campus as the Community Medical Center, so knowing that the hospital is close by is very comforting and convenient for our patients. The building that we’re in is comprised of oncology-based physicians, so it’s a one-stop shop as well and all of the doctors collaborate with Dr. Eltoukhy.
Pete: It’s great. That does sound like you have an ideal environment.
Financial Benefit of Going to a Community Provider
Pete: No offense, but people tend to think less of a community-based hospital when you’re providing the same quality of care as if they went directly to a university-based hospital. But then on the flip side, is there a cost savings for the patient for going the community-based hospital route? They’re getting the same standard of care, but is it more affordable for certain patients to do that?
Dr. Eltoukhy: I do think so. Care at a community hospital can be often more affordable and accessible for patients and that’s an important factor when considering treatment options. One of the biggest advantages is the reduced financial burden related to travel and lodging. When patients are treated closer to home, they don’t have to worry about the added expense of traveling long distances, taking extended time off work, or even arranging accommodations closer to a larger academic center. This alone can make a significant difference, especially for patients undergoing long-term treatments, such as patients who have Waldenström’s.
From a healthcare cost perspective, community hospitals can also offer more cost-effective care without compromising quality. Administrative and operational costs tend to be lower in the community setting and that can translate into lower out-of-pocket expenses for patients. Additionally, treatments and services provided locally often come with fewer facility fees compared to larger institutions.
Another important factor to consider is insurance coverage. Community hospitals are typically well-integrated with the local insurance networks, which makes it easier for patients to access care that is covered under their plan. This can help minimize unexpected medical bills or any out-of-network charges that might arise when seeking treatment at larger, more specialized centers.
From a healthcare cost perspective, community hospitals can also offer more cost-effective care without compromising quality.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Ultimately, by offering high-quality comprehensive care in a local setting, community hospitals provide patients with financial and logistical advantages, and this accessibility ensures that patients can focus on their treatment and recovery without the added extra stress of significant financial strain.
Pete: I was having significant issues early on. Because of my insurance and health situation, I had to decide whether I should go out of state for the next level of care to resolve my issues at the time. Fortunately, what’s in place is if it becomes serious enough, you have a very good support network in your local community hospital, but you can reach out for a second opinion to centers of excellence and that’s important for people to understand. You don’t have to travel, especially if you can’t do it physically because of your health situation. The resources are there. You just have to work with your medical staff and coordinate that.
Monitoring Waldenström’s Patients on Watch and Wait
Pete: From your perspective and your experience, what are key considerations in monitoring disease activity for patients who are on a watch-and-wait status? How often do you follow up with them? What do you typically do in your practice?
Dr. Eltoukhy: For patients with Waldenström’s who are on a watch-and-wait approach, regular monitoring is essential. This strategy is common because many patients are asymptomatic at diagnosis or have very slowly progressive disease. This disease usually doesn’t require immediate treatment. However, just because treatment isn’t starting right away doesn’t mean the disease isn’t being closely managed.
In my practice, follow-up appointments typically occur every three to six months, depending on the patient’s specific situation and how stable their condition is. During these visits, we focus on clinical assessments and laboratory monitoring. We look at hemoglobin levels to monitor for anemia. We monitor IgM levels to track monoclonal protein. We check serum viscosity if there are any symptoms suggestive of hyperviscosity.
We also check kidney function, calcium levels, and assess for any signs of organ involvement. A thorough physical exam is equally important. I look for signs like enlarged lymph nodes, enlarged spleen, enlarged liver, and ask about any new or worsening symptoms, like fatigue, night sweats, weight loss, neuropathy, or changes in vision that could signal disease progression.
Key signs that might indicate a need to move from watchful waiting to active treatment usually include worsening anemia, symptomatic hyperviscosity, significant weight loss, fevers, night sweats, organ enlargement, or the development of any kind of neuropathy that would affect your daily life. If any of these arise, we reassess and discuss the treatment options.
In addition to monitoring, I always like to emphasize the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Staying active, eating a balanced, healthy, and whole foods diet, and managing other health conditions, like high blood pressure or diabetes, can improve overall well-being and help patients feel more in control of their health.
Emotional support is also very important as living with chronic conditions like Waldenström’s, even in a watch-and-wait phase, can be stressful. Regular follow-ups not only track disease activity but also provide reassurance and a structured plan for managing the condition over time.
The watch-and-wait approach is not about doing nothing. It’s more of a proactive strategy based on solid data and extensive clinical experience.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Pete: Could you talk a little bit more about the emotional and psychological challenges in that aspect? How do you help a patient navigate through that part of having the disease?
Dr. Eltoukhy: Living with a chronic condition like Waldenström’s, especially under our watch-and-wait approach, can be emotionally challenging for many patients. There’s this uncertainty of knowing you have a cancer diagnosis but not needing immediate treatment. Many patients will relay that it creates a lot of anxiety and stress. It’s completely natural to feel this way, but there are several strategies that we try to do to help patients cope with this.
I try to emphasize that it’s important to remember that the watch-and-wait approach is not about doing nothing. It’s more of a proactive strategy based on solid data and extensive clinical experience. If we recommend monitoring rather than immediate treatment, it’s because we know from research and patient outcomes that this is the safest and most effective approach for certain cases. Sometimes, if you explain it to them this way, it can help alleviate some of this uncertainty and fear.
That said, managing the emotional side of this journey is as important. Stress management techniques like mindfulness meditation and deep breathing exercises can help reduce day-to-day anxiety. Regular physical activity is also excellent, even doing something as simple as walking, which I always advocate for my patients. If you ask any of my patients, I tell them, “Do you track your steps daily? If not, you should start tracking and start increasing.”
Start with small goals and try to work your way up. If you can get that to 10,000 steps, great, but start somewhere, even if it’s at a lower number. Increasing physical activity can have a profound impact on mental health by improving mood and reducing stress. I’ve seen it with my patients. I’ve had patients who have done this and say their energy level has increased.
By focusing on physical health and emotional well-being, patients can live full, active lives while feeling confident that their condition is being closely monitored.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Support groups are also important. They can be very valuable whether they’re in person or online. Connecting with others who are going through the same experience can provide a sense of community and shared understanding. It helps to know that you’re not alone in navigating these emotional ups and downs. Counseling or speaking with a mental health professional can also be very helpful. They can provide tools to manage anxiety and cope with uncertainty.
It’s very important to emphasize to patients the importance of staying connected with their loved ones. Family and friends can be an essential support system, offering emotional comfort and practical help when needed. Maintaining a positive outlook doesn’t mean ignoring the challenges but trying to focus on what’s in your control. Staying active, attending regular follow-ups, and trying to lead a fulfilling life despite having a diagnosis.
Ultimately, while the watch-and-wait approach can feel uncertain, it’s grounded in strong evidence and a deep understanding of the way Waldenström’s progresses and acts. By focusing on physical health and emotional well-being, patients can live full, active lives while feeling confident that their condition is being closely monitored. At RWJBarnabas, we offer many support groups and have a regular monthly calendar that we offer to patients.
Maria: As the supportive team to the provider and the patient, we do our best so that the patient doesn’t have to worry about anything as far as authorizations or appointments. We educate them on all of that because those can be also very stressful for them. We try to take all of that away from them so they can focus on their health.
However, we also use the resources that are on campus. There are plenty of groups, like Dr. Eltoukhy said. We also have resources that include dietary and social work that we can refer these patients to and support them.
The staff here is kind and empathetic and treats patients like family. They know that they can call us if they’re scared and we don’t rush them. They know if something happens or they’re having a little symptom in between, they can call, they will receive a callback, and we will take the time to listen and report it to Dr. Eltoukhy, who will then follow up. They know that even though there is a bit of a wait, they can reach out to us at any time.
We do our best so that the patient doesn’t have to worry about anything… so they can focus on their health.
Maria Lamantia
Pete: That’s great. Thank you to both of you. You touched on many aspects, much more than I even anticipated. Your advice is very sound and your practice is amazing and commendable. I know from personal experience that a lot of the things that you mentioned are important in helping a patient navigate through not only the physical health aspects but also the mental health aspects of dealing with the disease and living with a chronic illness.
I go to my local hospital. I take notice of what services they provide and if they have any special programs coming up, I take advantage of them. I’m deeply involved in volunteering for the IWMF, but they help me immensely. It’s always important whatever cancer you have to try and get together with patients who have similar cancers to learn from each other and share stories. There’s a healing aspect in sharing and understanding what someone else has gone through and the IWMF provides that capability.
The IWMF has support groups and affiliates all around the world that help patients. We have a weekly newsletter, online discussion groups, webinars, and an annual education forum. We answer any questions patients, their caregivers, or their family members may have at any point in time.
I encourage people to visit IWMF.com and check out their services. It’s an extra level of care that you can get besides what you’re getting from a very caring hematologist-oncologist and a very caring staff who works with them. I can’t speak highly enough of the very qualified medical community and medical staff and the IWMF. When you put those two together, you’re in very good hands.
How Waldenström’s Patients Should Talk to Their Healthcare Team About Their Symptoms
Pete: Another thing that comes up, especially when you’re dealing with a disease that is chronic and you’re in a watch-and-wait period, is odd manifestations that you think is the disease. How should a patient communicate those symptoms? Should they say something or not say something? What’s your advice for communicating any symptoms to their healthcare team?
Dr. Eltoukhy: Effective communication with your healthcare team is crucial when managing a condition like Waldenström’s, especially if you’re on a watch-and-wait approach. One of the most important things patients can do is to promptly report any new or worsening symptoms. You don’t have to wait for your next scheduled appointment, whether it’s in three or six months. I end every single visit with my patients by telling them that if anything comes up before the next appointment, they should call and come in. I don’t say that to fill in the gaps. I tell the patients over and over again, “Do not wait. Come in.”
Effective communication with your healthcare team is crucial when managing a condition like Waldenström’s.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
It’s important for patients to understand that and to know that they can reach out to their doctor. You don’t have to wait. You’re not bothering anyone. We want you to do that. We want you to come in. I want to know if anything is going on because we want to catch some of these symptoms like hyperviscosity very early. Don’t wait. Call your team. If you can’t see the doctor, see one of their colleagues or their nurse practitioner. If something feels different or concerning, reach out right away. That’s what we’re here for.
Keeping a symptom diary can be a very helpful tool. By tracking how you feel on a daily or weekly basis, you can start to identify patterns or changes over time that might not be obvious at the moment. Note things like fatigue levels, changes in weight, night sweats, any new pains anywhere, or any new neurological symptoms like numbness or tingling. Detailed information can give your doctor and the rest of your team a clearer picture of what’s happening and can help guide decisions about whether it’s time to adjust your plan.
Listening to your body and trusting your instincts is also key. No one knows your body better than you. If your gut is telling you that something isn’t right, whether it’s a new symptom or a shift in how you’re feeling overall, it’s important to speak up. You’re not bothering anybody. No one’s going to think otherwise.
Your healthcare team is your partner on this journey. Open and ongoing communication ensures that we can address concerns early and adjust care as needed.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
What’s the worst-case scenario? It wasn’t caused by Waldenström’s. As a patient, don’t think anything of it. We want you to tell us all the new symptoms. We want to know what’s going on because we’re here to help the patient.
Sometimes, subtle changes can signal that it’s time to reassess and take a different plan. If you were on the cusp of considering treatment, maybe it’s time to consider it or not consider it. Remember that your healthcare team is your partner on this journey. Open and ongoing communication ensures that we can address concerns early and adjust care as needed. Once again, don’t hesitate to reach out. This is why we’re here. We’re here to support you every step of the way.
Clinical Trials for Waldenström’s Patients
Pete: You mentioned that even in the community hospital setting, you participate in clinical trials. Are clinical trials being conducted in your setting? What kind of trials do you have your patients participating in?
Dr. Eltoukhy: Across all cancers, we currently have over 60 clinical trials available at our community cancer center, including many for hematologic malignancies. We offer phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. We’re not able to offer phase 1 clinical trials at this time.
Offering clinical trials in a community setting is a great way to provide patients with access to cutting-edge treatment without requiring them to travel to larger academic centers. When determining the feasibility of conducting trials in our center, one of the biggest considerations that we look at is resources. It’s not just about having the physical space or the equipment. We need to ensure that we have the right personnel and infrastructure in place to manage trials safely and effectively. This includes dedicated research coordinators, nurses, pharmacists, and regulatory staff who are trained in clinical trial protocols and patient safety.
Our goal is to offer trials that are not only scientifically valuable but also feasible and safe to administer in the community setting.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Clinical trials in the US are very heavily regulated and rightfully so. There are strict guidelines and oversight to ensure that every trial is conducted ethically, that patient safety is the top priority, and that data is collected accurately. We have to assess whether we can meet all those requirements from patient monitoring to data reporting while maintaining the highest standard of care.
Ultimately, our goal is to offer trials that are not only scientifically valuable but also feasible and safe to administer in the community setting. We want to make sure patients have access to innovative treatments while receiving the same level of care and oversight that they would expect from one of these larger academic centers.
Different Phases of Clinical Trials
Pete: For those who aren’t as knowledgeable about clinical trials, can you do a quick overview of the different phases of clinical trials?
Dr. Eltoukhy: Phase 1 is when a new drug starts to be administered. Once you move on to phase 2, you have already determined the safety of the drug and you’re starting to look at efficacy and how it could work. Once you move on to phase 3, you have a better understanding of how well it works and how safe it is, and you’re looking at a broader approach and getting the real data on efficacy and how well it works.
A phase 4 clinical trial is always ongoing. Any drug that’s out there is always being monitored to make sure that it continues to be safe because safety doesn’t end after phase 1 or phase 2. Safety is ongoing. In phase 1, they’re new drugs that need very close monitoring and you could have unexpected side effects. We don’t quite partake in phase 1 trials right now, but we have many phase 2 and phase 3 trials.
Busting Clinical Trial Myths
Pete: In a community clinical team, what can you do to ensure patients will learn about clinical trial options and whether they should be concerned about the potential side effects of being in a clinical trial? Am I going to be worse off by doing that or not? How do you educate them? How do they find out about the clinical trials?
Dr. Eltoukhy: That’s a very common concern. Ensuring patients learn about and understand clinical trial options starts with the clinical team, especially the physician. Physicians should take an active role in discussing these opportunities directly with the patients.
When I open a clinical trial at our community center, it’s because I believe it has the potential to benefit the patients. But offering a trial isn’t enough. We have to make sure that patients understand, are fully informed, and are comfortable with their options. For me, that means sitting down with each patient and having an open, honest conversation.
The right choice for one patient isn’t necessarily the best for another patient. It’s essential to personalize the discussion based on the patient’s health status, personal preferences, and lifestyle.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
I explain what we can offer under the standard of care, what treatments are currently approved and routinely used, and lay out what the clinical trials could provide. I go through the potential benefits, the goals of the study, and also any limitations or uncertainties. Patients must understand not just the possibilities but also the risks and the level of commitment involved.
One of the most critical aspects of these conversations is avoiding bias. My role isn’t to push a patient toward one option or another but to provide them with all the necessary information to make an educated, confident decision. What might be the right choice for one patient isn’t necessarily the best for another patient. It’s essential to personalize the discussion based on the patient’s health status, personal preferences, and lifestyle.
Ultimately, patients should feel empowered to choose the path that’s best for them, whether that’s enrolling in a clinical trial or sticking with the standard of care. By fostering clear, transparent communication, we try to help patients navigate their options and ensure that they’re making decisions that align with their goals and values.
Our goal is to offer as many trial opportunities as we can in our setting but also to recognize when a referral is necessary for something more specialized.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Bringing Waldenström’s Clinical Trials to the Community Cancer Care Site
Pete: From a perspective of trying to make sure that your patients are aware of these clinical trials and wanting them to take advantage of them if it’s in their best interest, how do you ensure that they have access to the latest trials? How does it work for your hospital system to get involved in a clinical trial, especially for Waldenström’s patients? Do you seek them out yourself or are you approached by the people who are running the trial? How does the process work?
Dr. Eltoukhy: We recognize the importance of staying connected with larger academic centers that may offer these opportunities. A lot of times, we will open trials collaboratively with the Rutgers Cancer Institute. One of the key roles of community medical centers is to understand where we fit within the broader healthcare system. It’s not a one-size-fits-all approach. We need to be very clear about what we can effectively manage in our setting and when it’s in the patient’s best interest to refer them to an academic center for a clinical trial or more specialized treatment.
Once again, it’s not about limitations in expertise. It’s about ensuring patients receive the best possible care whether that’s locally or through a specialized trial at an academic center. Of course, whenever possible, we want to provide that care closer to home. It’s more comfortable, more cost-effective, and less burdensome. Traveling long distances to participate in a clinical trial can be incredibly challenging, especially when dealing with the physical and emotional toll of cancer care.
High-quality cancer care isn’t limited to large academic centers. Community hospitals like ours play a vital role in delivering comprehensive, patient-centered care that’s accessible, effective, and personalized.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Our goal is to offer as many trial opportunities as we can in our setting but also to recognize when a referral is necessary for something more specialized. Effective collaboration means maintaining strong communication with the academic center, letting them know what trials we have open, what we can manage, and as importantly, what we can’t. By advocating for our patients and fostering these partnerships, we’ve been able to create a seamless system where patients benefit from the convenience of local care and innovations of cutting-edge research when needed. It’s about working together to make sure patients have access to the best options, wherever they may be.
Pete: The IWMF, through the efforts of Dr. Jorge Castillo at Dana-Farber, has established the WM-NET, which is designed to become a network of hospitals across the United States that will participate collectively in clinical trials and have them at their sites. Not all of the participating organizations are going to do all of the trials, but they will try and distribute it more broadly to make it easier for patients to get access to these trials locally rather than having to travel to a major cancer center.
Final Takeaways
Pete: Thank you, Dr. Eltoukhy and Maria, for your time and perspective on providing care to Waldenström’s patients in your hospital setting and community-based hospitals. Do you have any final remarks you want to pass along to Waldenström’s patients?
Maria: It would be an honor to treat you and take care of you. Consider our establishment if you don’t want to go to the bigger facilities. It’s a more boutique-like atmosphere. If you come to see Dr. Eltoukhy, you will be in very good hands. It’s an honor to work alongside him.
At the end of the day, cancer care is a partnership between doctors and patients, between community hospitals and academic centers, and between healthcare teams and families.
Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy
Dr. Eltoukhy: Thank you so much for having me. It’s been a privilege to share my perspective on improving outcomes for patients with Waldenström’s, particularly within the community setting.
I hope it’s clear that high-quality cancer care isn’t limited to large academic centers. Community hospitals like ours play a vital role in delivering comprehensive, patient-centered care that’s accessible, effective, and personalized. Whether it’s through offering clinical trials, collaborating with larger academic centers, or simply being there for patients in their communities, the goal is always the same: to provide the best possible care tailored to each individual’s needs. It’s about open communication, staying informed, and making sure patients feel empowered and supported throughout their journey.
At the end of the day, cancer care is a partnership between doctors and patients, between community hospitals and academic centers, and between healthcare teams and families. By working together, we can ensure that every patient has access to the best treatments, latest research, and compassionate care that they deserve, no matter where they are. Thank you again for the opportunity to be part of this important conversation.
Pete: It’s been a pleasure speaking to both of you. I learned a lot and got a better appreciation, other than what I already have, of community care practitioners and the dedication and care they have, making sure that Waldenström’s patients are on the path to living healthier and fuller lives. You are instrumental in making sure that happens, so I commend both of you.
For Waldenström’s patients, caregivers, and families, it’s very important at the beginning to establish a good working relationship with a hematologist-oncologist who’s going to be managing your journey with Waldenström’s. It’s important to decide what practice or hospital setting you prefer to go to for periodic testing and treatments, or extended hospital stays if you should ever need them when you have some significant issues. All the doctors, nurses, physician assistants, medical staff, and clinical staff are to be commended for their commitment on a day-to-day basis to help all of us live fuller, healthier lives.
Establish a good working relationship with a hematologist-oncologist who’s going to be managing your journey with Waldenström’s.
Pete DeNardis
I want to encourage anyone around the world who’s affected by the disease to take advantage of opportunities that are out there to find the best local hospital systems that can cater to their needs but also to be involved with an organization devoted specifically to their disease, like the International Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia Foundation. The IWMF is the only global organization dedicated specifically to the support, education, and research of Waldenström’s.
Stephanie: Thank you so much to Pete, Dr. Eltoukhy, and Maria for providing such incredible context. Self-advocacy is vital, especially for Waldenström’s where having long-term care and long-term doctor-patient relationships are so important. Don’t be afraid to speak up for yourself and ask any questions that are coming up for you, whether you’re a patient or a care partner. The keyword that Dr. Eltoukhy kept talking about was partnership. It doesn’t have to be one place or the other, as long as the medical team is working in partnership with you.
We also want to thank again our sponsor, Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, for its support of our independent patient program. We would be remiss to forget shouting out our partners, The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) and the International Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia Foundation (IWMF). Visit their websites for more on these wonderful organizations and what they provide in terms of quality services for patients and care partners in Waldenström’s.
Thank you so much for joining our program. We hope that this was helpful for you and that you walk away with more knowledge and understanding and more questions. We hope to see you at another discussion. Take good care.
Navigating Waldenströms: Getting the Best Care Close to Home
Hosted by The Patient Story
Join WM patient advocate Pete DeNardis and expert hematologist Dr. Hussam Eltoukhy as they discuss the latest in community-based cancer care, personalized treatment options, and effective communication strategies.
Thank you to Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, for supporting our independent patient education content. The Patient Story retains full editorial control.
CLL Treatment Advances: Moving from Research to Reality
Targeted Therapies, Breakthrough Combinations, and Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
The world of CLL treatment is evolving fast, with new breakthroughs offering more options and greater precision than ever before.
This program brings together expert Dr. Jeff Sharman and patient advocate Andrew Schorr to break down the most important updates from recent research and clinical trials. Learn what’s changing, how it impacts treatment decisions, and what it all means for patients today.
Webinar: CLL Treatment Advances: Moving From Research to Reality
Hosted by The Patient Story
The world of CLL treatment is evolving fast. This program breaks down the most important updates from recent research and clinical trials. Learn what’s changing, how it impacts treatment decisions, and what it all means for patients today.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider for treatment decisions.
Thank you to AbbVie for its support of our independent patient education program. The Patient Story retains full editorial control over all content.
Stephanie Chuang: Welcome to “CLL Treatment Advances: Moving from Research to Reality,” a program focused on all of the latest in research and clinical trials in the world of CLL treatment. It’s a space that we know has experienced so much development in the last few years especially. While that’s incredible news, it also means that there might be more questions about CLL treatment options. We are featuring some incredible CLL advocates on the topic from both the specialist side and the patient side.
I’m the founder of The Patient Story and I was diagnosed with a different kind of blood cancer, an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. While I was undergoing hundreds of hours of chemo, the idea for The Patient Story came up. I thought that other people would want humanized information the way that I did and that’s what we try to do. We help people navigate life at and after diagnosis in human terms and build community through in-depth patient stories and educational discussions.
We want to thank our sponsor, AbbVie, for supporting this program, which helps us host more of these discussions for free. I want to stress that, as always, The Patient Story retains full editorial control over all content. While we hope that this is helpful, keep in mind that this is not a substitute for medical advice so still consult with your health team about your decisions.
There’s so much to get through, so I will hand it over to someone many of you are very familiar with and who I’m proud to say has become a friend of mine, Andrew Schorr.
Andrew Schorr: Hello and welcome to this program. We’re going to discuss the latest in CLL, particularly based on one of the big medical meetings that happened not too long ago where a lot of studies came out. What does it mean for all of us? I’m in San Diego and I’ve been living with CLL since 1996.
Dr. Jeff Sharman: It’s great to be back with you, Andrew. Thanks for having me.
What Happens After a CLL Diagnosis?
Andrew: Jeff, I’ve been living with CLL for many years. Some people who will watch this program are newly diagnosed. I went through all the stages and I’m sure you see it in your practice daily. “What the hell is this? I’m scared. I have a blood cancer. Will my life be shorter? Am I going to die anytime soon? What do you have that’s effective to treat me? If that doesn’t work, do you have something else?” We’re going to get into all that, but at a high level, Jeff, how do you feel for today’s patient?
As a doctor, one of the things is figuring out how to administer the most unique medicine we give, which is the medicine of hope
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Dr. Sharman: I have a very large practice. I take care of about 400 CLL patients and for many of them, I’ve been their first doctor. That’s the nature of my practice. For a lot of folks I take care of, I’m their first contact in terms of understanding CLL.
What you highlighted is something I see time and time again, which is a very understandable fear patients come in with. It’s very common. You say leukemia and you see their eyes widen and see them sit up a little straighter. What you recognize is a great deal of distress that any cancer would cause. As a doctor, one of the things is figuring out how to administer the most unique medicine we give, which is the medicine of hope, and communicate that with patients in the midst of some of the worst days of their lives.
I do reference quite frequently a study done in the Italian group, which showed that if you’re age 65 and above diagnosed with CLL, you can’t measure a statistical impact on survival. Most patients are going to outlive their diagnosis and that’s an optimistic message. Most patients aren’t going to pass away from their disease and that bears out from my experience. The number of patients who die from complications of CLL is a very small fraction. Even in my large CLL practice, it’s only a small number; two or three per year might be the case. We have a lot of treatment options for CLL apart from the traditional chemotherapy. We have targeted agents, immunotherapy, and so forth.
Most patients are going to outlive their diagnosis and that’s an optimistic message.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Andrew: The bottom line is most of us are going to live a pretty normal life. We may need to take medicines along the way, but we have more effective medicines than ever before and others that are very promising.
The Latest Treatment Options for CLL
Andrew: I was diagnosed in 1996, but I wasn’t treated until 2000. At that time, the feeling was that treatment might be more harmful than waiting and seeing what happens. There’s still a percentage of patients who never need treatment.
I was in a clinical trial of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with rituximab. It led to a 17-year remission, but it had the chemo component. I had a treatment that sometimes comes into play years later, which was high-dose methylprednisolone with obinutuzumab. That was about seven years ago and I’ve never had any treatment since then.
Each year, there are several meetings where you discuss the latest in research in CLL, but the big meeting in December 2024 was the American Society of Hematology meeting or ASH. The impression I had, Jeff, was we have several approved therapies, but we have what looks like planes circling the airport at different altitudes — stage 1, stage 2, stage 3 — that are very promising and are waiting in the wings for CLL. We will get into the details, but am I right that we have a lot coming?
Dr. Sharman: A lot is coming, Andrew. At these meetings, we get to see a cross-section of development. We see all those airplanes in various stages of flight. Some are coming in for landing, some are still on the assembly line, some are mid-flight, and so forth. There are severeal reasons to be optimistic about what’s out there.
Andrew: Let’s understand where we are with approved therapy. I had some chemo years ago, but you mentioned that people aren’t going to need chemo. We have this whole class of medicines — BTK inhibitors — and even new generations of that we can talk about. With the approved therapies, you have quite an arsenal now where you can use drugs either by themselves or together.
Dr. Sharman: There are three main classes of drugs. You mentioned BTK inhibitors. I would add BCL-2 inhibitors and immunotherapy, particularly obinutuzumab, which goes by the commercial name Gazyva. It took a lot of work to get each of these drugs approved. Right now, we’ve learned how to combine these drugs in terms of what we call doublet therapy, where we use two of those drugs together, and even triplet therapy, where we put three of them together. What the field is trying to figure out is the best combination and the best sequence.
The good news is these drugs are FDA-approved and available to patients. When most patients think about chemotherapy, they think of the traditional drugs developed from the 1950s through the year 2000. Those are drugs that typically damage DNA and cause cells to die as a result of damaging DNA.
What’s different now is we have these targeted therapies, which have no DNA-damaging component but instead exploit certain vulnerabilities of the cancer cell. There’s an enzyme sequence or a signaling mechanism inside a cell. I like to think of it as an electrical current, which needs to keep going to keep the CLL cell alive. What BTK inhibitors do is cause a short circuit in that electrical circuit, so the cancer cells die as a result. It turns out that the cancer cells are more sensitive to it than normal healthy B cells. It’s a targeted therapy. It doesn’t damage DNA. It exploits a certain vulnerability.
BCL-2 inhibitors are similar in that the cancer cells are dependent upon this enzyme called BCL-2, which helps keep the cell alive. If we disrupt BCL-2, it’s almost like taking off the fence from around the Grand Canyon — they fall in and the cancer cells die as a result. It gets rid of the safety mechanism for the cells.
With obinutuzumab, what we’re doing is recruiting the immune system to fight off the cancer of the immune system. It’s as though we’re giving the immune system the tools it needs to fight off the cancer that’s already there.
Each of these drugs has its side effects. There’s no such thing as a drug that doesn’t have side effects, but in contrast to traditional chemotherapy, it’s not the same type of patient experience. These aren’t nausea-provoking drugs and they certainly don’t cause hair loss. In a lot of cases, these drugs are pretty easy to take side by side with the rest of your medications and you might not necessarily know there’s something unique about it, if that makes sense.
Andrew: As far as BTKs, we have ibrutinib (Imbruvica), acalabrutinib (Calquence), zanubrutinib (Brukinsa), and pirtobrutinib (Jaypirca). For BCL-2, we have venetoclax (Venclexta) and others in development. Many people are taking BTKs now. How do you determine who gets what?
Dr. Sharman: There’s a lot of terminology around first-generation, second-generation, and third-generation. We’re researching fourth-generation BTK inhibitors.
The very first BTK inhibitor to come about was ibrutinib, which turns off the BTK enzyme in a unique way. It forms a bond with the BTK molecule, which we call an irreversible inhibitor or covalent inhibitor. It forms a permanent attachment to the BTK enzyme so that particular enzyme will never work again until the cancer cell makes a new one. Cancer cells make new ones and in about 24 hours, they’re starting to wake up their BTK, which is why ibrutinib is taken once a day. The new enzyme needs to be shut down, just like the old enzyme was.
There are some unique side effects with ibrutinib. We see an increased rate of bruising and bleeding, which tends to be mild arm bruising. For most patients, it doesn’t prove to be all that much, but a lot of our patients are already on blood thinners so if you start adding them together, the risk of bleeding goes up. We see some joint aches and muscle cramps happen. Occasionally, patients can have an abnormal heart rhythm called atrial fibrillation. Originally, we didn’t know if that came from the drug, but we’ve largely concluded now that it does.
That left room for the second-generation BTK inhibitors, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib. These medications underwent more rigorous pre-clinical development of medicinal chemistry to try to dial out some of those side effects. In fact, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib have been compared head to head against ibrutinib in various studies and have shown fewer side effects for most patients and some increased efficacy. Within the field, most doctors who follow this area closely tend to start patients on either acalabrutinib or zanubrutinib.
How do we pick? Sometimes it’s an insurance issue. Sometimes you might have some bias. The cardiac differentiation is a bit in favor of acalabrutinib. In the head-to-head study where zanubrutinib was compared to ibrutinib, there may be a signal of higher efficacy. If you’re going to combine it with obinutuzumab, you go with acalabrutinib. There are various reasons you might pick one over the other. Sometimes it comes down to insurance, but I view acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib as more similar than different.
What is Pirtobrutinib?
Andrew: You used the term covalent. I understand there are non-covalent BTKs and I believe pirtobrutinib is one of those. What’s the difference?
Dr. Sharman: We talked about acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib as second-generation BTK inhibitors because they differentiate from ibrutinib. We consider pirtobrutinib a third-generation BTK inhibitor.
When we talk about the different generations, what’s the main difference? It’s a non-covalent inhibitor. Over time, patients can develop resistance to the first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors and the most common way they do that is by modifying the exact spot on the BTK enzyme where the first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors bind. There’s an amino acid in position 481 called cysteine that can get mutated. All of a sudden, those drugs don’t work. There are other mutations, but that’s the most common one.
Pirtobrutinib does not require forming a bond. It stays in the system a little bit longer, fits into the binding pocket more easily, and doesn’t require that irreversible bond. Pirtobrutinib has been shown to work even after patients have developed resistance to the first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors and that’s what differentiates it as a third-generation BTK inhibitor.
Another one in late development is called nemtabrutinib, which may or may not get approved — I suspect it will. It may still be a little ways away and has flown under the radar a little bit. The distinct advantage of non-covalent inhibitors is they can continue to inhibit the BTK enzyme even after the first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors have stopped working.
What is a Degrader?
Andrew: Some of our patients are like mini scientists and are asking about degraders. What are degraders? I know we don’t have them approved yet, but where are they going to fit in?
Dr. Sharman: They would be a fourth-generation BTK inhibitor. I’ll take the cloud-level view. One paradigm in all of oncology is that when you find a good target, a good enzyme to inhibit, or a good surface target, there are always efforts to continue to exploit the therapeutic opportunity of going after that target in new and improved ways. Clearly, one of the improved ways is to work when the other drugs stop working.
BTK degraders get rid of the BTK enzyme completely instead of turning it off.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
The concept of degraders is a lot like pirtobrutinib, although it does it through a different mechanism. It’s designed to inhibit BTK even when the BTK inhibitors have stopped working. Within any cell — cancer cell or regular cell — there is trash disposal for old broken-down proteins. We are constantly synthesizing new proteins and getting rid of the old ones. Degraders glue a couple of molecules together — one that goes after BTK and then the other one designates the protein for the trash heap — and tags the BTK molecule to dispose of this enzyme. Instead of inhibiting BTK, it’s degrading BTK, which is very different. BTK degraders get rid of the BTK enzyme completely instead of turning it off.
BTK degraders are a very active area of research right now. These would be the airplanes that aren’t necessarily coming in for a landing or even mid-flight. They are still getting manufactured and haven’t taken off from the ground.
CLL Treatments Being Studied Now
Andrew: Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor, which is a different mechanism of action. There are other BCL-2s in development as well. What are some of the names?
Dr. Sharman: Sonrotoclax is probably the one that’s farthest along. There have been a handful of other BCL-2 inhibitors that have gotten out there. Venetoclax is an incredibly effective drug. In fact, it’s so effective that its effectiveness may almost be its biggest liability. It can literally kill cancer cells so fast that the consequences of that can be some electrolyte abnormalities and disturbances that can be life-threatening, which is what we call tumor lysis syndrome where you’re killing cancer cells too quickly. The inside of cancer cells has a lot of potassium and uric acid.
Andrew: Your kidneys can’t keep up.
Dr. Sharman: You can’t keep up. It can clog up the kidneys, cause heart arrhythmias, and so forth. With venetoclax, we start with a very low dose of 20 mg for a week. The following week, we go up to 50 mg. The week after, we go up to 100 mg. Then 200 mg. Patients generally go on 400 mg.
It also has some drug interactions, more for our patients who have acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or patients on cardiac medications. What we have to do is check labs frequently. We stratify the risk for these patients. Are they low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk? That has to do with how high their white blood cell count is, how big their lymph nodes are, and how their kidneys function, so we follow these patients closely. For a lot of patients, it’s a month with a lot of lab visits. Sometimes, we even put patients in the hospital when we start the medication because we want to be able to jump into gear if they’re high risk.
It has logistical challenges. It’s not used quite as frequently in the front-line setting as BTK inhibitors, which are oftentimes quite simple to give, but it’s a very effective drug. One of the big advantages is it gives very deep remissions. Oftentimes, we’re able to give patients the drug for one year in the front-line setting, two years in the relapse setting, and then stop the medicine. Patients can have remissions that can last multiple years without requiring ongoing therapy. Whereas with BTK inhibitors, once we start them, patients always ask, “Am I going to be on this forever?” I say, “You’re going to be on it as long as it’s working for you.” For many patients, it can be from five to 10 years, which feels like a long time to be on an anti-cancer medicine for patients.
Patients can have remissions that can last multiple years without requiring ongoing therapy.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Deciding When to Use a Combination of Drugs for Treatment
Andrew: Let’s tie this together. We have BTK inhibitors that work for most people and depending on the side effects you might experience, the health of your heart, or other issues you might have, your doctor would work with you to choose one that’s the kindest on your body. You might combine it with another drug. You talked about doublets or even triplets, so somebody might receive one of these drugs with obinutuzumab. Would somebody get a BTK and a venetoclax?
Dr. Sharman: That leads us to some of the discussions at the 2024 ASH meeting. If we go back in time to a couple of meetings ago, we saw data for the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax that was compared against one of the standards at that time, which included obinutuzumab with a chemotherapy drug that’s not used much anymore called chlorambucil. The ibrutinib-venetoclax clearly beat obinutuzumab-chlorambucil and interestingly, we had a different opinion depending on where you are in the world as to whether or not it could be approved. That combination was approved in most of Europe and is reimbursed by insurance in several jurisdictions. In fact, ibrutinib-venetoclax is a very common regimen utilized in Europe.
The combination of acalabrutinib-venetoclax or the triplet acalabrutinib-venetoclax with obinutuzumab was compared against two of the harder chemoimmunotherapy regimens.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Interestingly, there was a different take on the US regulatory environment. There were some technical reasons that had to do with some of the side effects of combining ibrutinib with venetoclax. Diarrhea was considerably more common and this was in an older population. It was a harder regimen in older patients. The US did not approve it.
You have this difference between the US and Europe. The combination of ibrutinib-venetoclax is not used much in the United States outside of some studies. It does have an endorsement by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Oftentimes, you could get it, but it leaves a window of opportunity for other BTK inhibitors, which gets us into some of the discussion at the 2024 ASH meeting.
The combination of acalabrutinib-venetoclax or the triplet acalabrutinib-venetoclax with obinutuzumab was compared against two of the harder chemoimmunotherapy regimens, either fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) or bendamustine-rituximab (BR). In both experimental arms, the doublet (acalabrutinib-venetoclax) and the triplet (acalabrutinib-venetoclax with obinutuzumab) beat chemoimmunotherapy.
Within the field, there’s an expectation that there will be approval fairly soon for acalabrutinib-venetoclax with or without obinutuzumab, which is attractive to patients because it’s an all-oral regimen. You take the acalabrutinib for a while before you start the venetoclax. It cuts down on the risk of tumor lysis quite a bit. It’s convenient, effective, and fixed duration, so patients don’t take it until it stops working. There are a lot of advantages to that combination and it’s one of the things that we’re expecting to get an approval by the FDA sometime in 2025.
Andrew: To be clear though, obinutuzumab is an infused therapy.
Dr. Sharman: Yes, obinutuzumab is an infused therapy. The triplet includes obinutuzumab, which is an infused therapy.
Andrew: Jeff, it sounds like we’ve got lines of therapy. We have people who you might start on a single drug. You might have a discussion with a patient about fixed duration, putting two drugs together, taking them for a while, and if you can get their disease undetectable or very low, they can stop and see how long that goes. That might be attractive.
Dr. Sharman: We haven’t talked about obinutuzumab-venetoclax as another doublet. We’ve talked about BTK inhibitors. We’ve talked about venetoclax. Most of the time, once somebody starts a BTK inhibitor, they stay on it until it stops working.
Obinutuzumab-venetoclax is generally considered a one-year therapy. Patients start with obinutuzumab, get a sequence of several infusions, and continue on it for a total of six months. We start venetoclax somewhere around month two and go through a careful ramp-up. For those patients, we generally can stop at 12 months. For the molecularly favorable, they may not need therapy for another five, six, or seven years. For some of the higher risk, like the IGHV unmutated population, those remissions might not last quite as long. But one of the big things in the field right now is: what’s the optimal doublet?
Most of the time, once somebody starts a BTK inhibitor, they stay on it until it stops working.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
We have obinutuzumab-venetoclax. We’re likely going to have the approval of acalabrutinib-venetoclax. Which of the two would you rather do? There might be different reasons for different patients. I’m excited about the MAJIC study, which we helped design and lead. The study directly compares obinutuzumab-venetoclax to acalabrutinib-venetoclax. We’re going to learn a lot from that. Do you take it for one year or two years? All oral or IV? That’s one of the big questions in the field. If I’m going to pick a doublet, which two do I pick?
What is CAR T-cell Therapy?
Andrew: Some people will progress and there’s one kind of treatment we haven’t talked about yet: CAR T-cell therapy. Where do we stand with that? My friend Dr. Brian Koffman, who’s gone through many different therapies, had CAR T-cell therapy. It’s a big gun. Where does that fit in for people who don’t do so well on some of these other drugs?
Dr. Sharman: CAR T is an amazing science, Andrew. It’s so amazing to see. The concept here is that we have a patient go through a one-day procedure that is conceptually like dialysis. We take out and isolate their T cells then ship those T cells to a lab. They get reprogrammed in part by the use of a virus that’s been engineered to give the cell different instructions. The cells get manufactured, expanded, and infused back into the patient. It’s amazing, Andrew. The CLL cells get destroyed by these reprogrammed T cells and patients can get very deep remissions.
Now, this is a technology that’s not unique to CLL. In fact, it was first used in CLL and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The development in CLL stalled a little bit. But in other diseases, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and ALL, we feel very comfortable as a field saying that CAR T-cell therapy can be curative in those settings. It is too early to say whether it can be curative in CLL or not. My professional opinion is that for some patients, it could be.
Right now, [CAR T-cell therapy]’s only approved for patients who’ve had both a BTK inhibitor and a BCL-2 inhibitor, but it’s been an effective therapy for a number of my patients.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
The clinical trial that led to the approval of CAR T-cell therapy took the worst of the worst patients who were extraordinarily sick. The data that led to the approval wasn’t the most impressive or compelling; it limped across the finish line. That said, sometimes we design studies to get a drug approved by the FDA and then how we use them in the real world can differ. The opportunity with CAR T-cell therapy may exceed the perception from the study that led to its approval.
Who’s it right for? The reality is a lot of older patients with CLL may not ever need it. Give them a pill, send them on their way, and they’re going to be fine. But the younger they are, the more aggressive the disease, or the combination of young patients with aggressive disease, CAR T-cell therapy is something that needs to be factored into their thinking earlier on. Right now, it’s only approved for patients who’ve had both a BTK inhibitor and a BCL-2 inhibitor, but it’s been an effective therapy for a number of my patients.
We think about treatment sequencing… You need to almost have a game plan in mind for somebody from the outset.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Working with Your Doctor to Decide on a Treatment
Andrew: In 1996, when I started talking to Dr. Kanti Rai, one of the grandfathers in CLL in clinical research, there wasn’t much to talk about. I said, “Dr. Rai, it seems like you have a lot of furniture in the room and you’re trying to figure out where to put the couch, where to put the easy chair, and how to move things around.” It sounds like that’s where you are now, except you have more furniture.
Dr. Sharman: We’ve lived in the house longer, so it’s more cluttered, and we’ve upgraded the couch.
Andrew: I’m sure there are patients whose heads are spinning. Not all CLL patients are the same and treatment is an individualized choice.
Dr. Sharman: Absolutely. There are some patients who, from the physician’s perspective, I would say, “Oh, this is what we’re doing.” Then there are other patients who are very involved in their care and want to be involved in the decision-making. That’s great and they should be involved.
A patient might have preferences, but I may have different preferences based on how I’m thinking. Sometimes it’s a matter of calling to attention some of the potential side effects in a certain circumstance. Maybe somebody wants to do a fixed duration, but their kidneys aren’t doing well, they have bulky disease, or other reasons why we might pick one over the other.
We think about treatment sequencing. If we’re going to pick this first, what’s the patient going to look like five to seven years from now when we might need to do a second therapy? You need to almost have a game plan in mind for somebody from the outset.
When Do Doctors Decide to Start Treatment?
Andrew: I went four and a half years without treatment and felt pretty good. Then I started to develop some lymph nodes and my white blood count fueled by lymphocytes went up to about 283,000. My friend Dave has a white blood count that’s even higher than that, but he hasn’t had treatment and feels fine. When do you start treatment for a new patient?
Dr. Sharman: Back in the 1950s, steroids were a new thing. This was a byproduct of World War II and we were giving steroids to patients with CLL. In some original manuscripts, patients were getting white blood cell counts of 1.5 million, a number we would never see today. Patients always want to know: At what white count do I need to intervene? The answer is: There isn’t a white count where you need to intervene.
We look at the lymphocyte doubling time (LDT). When that number goes up more than twofold in less than six months, that’s our clue that we need to do something.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
You see doctors get squeamish at different thresholds. If you’re a non-CLL doc, you start to get squeamish around 100,000. If you’re a CLL doc, 200,000 or 300,000 will start to make you nervous. If you’ve been around the block a long time, you have patients who come into your clinic with a white count of 600,000 who are stable. You get desensitized to it.
It’s not a number; it’s a rate of change. It’s not about whether you hit 100, 200, 400, or 600; it’s how quickly your numbers are increasing. For a patient who’s climbing quite rapidly, we look at the lymphocyte doubling time (LDT). When that number goes up more than twofold in less than six months, that’s our clue that we need to do something.
There are other reasons we might treat somebody. When they have bulky lymph nodes, start developing marrow dysfunction, get anemic or their platelets are starting to go down, those can be reasons to intervene. If you treat a lot of CLL, you see some weird ones. I had a patient who had direct kidney involvement with the CLL and had significant kidney problems; that’s not a very common one.
What comes up periodically is fatigue. Some patients have disabling fatigue. They might be 55 years old. They’re not depressed. Their thyroid is fine. They’re not iron-deficient. But they can only go to work for four hours before they have to come home. Disabling fatigue is a reason to treat. These are all pretty well spelled out in the iwCLL criteria: rate of change, symptomatic, bulky lymph nodes, marrow dysfunction, and others. Those are the reasons we treat patients.
I have had some young women, one or two in particular, who were diagnosed at childbearing potential. It’s fine to have kids.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
CLL and Fertility Concerns in Younger Women
Andrew: Another thing that people wonder about is if they’re told they’re diagnosed with CLL and they’re younger and female, would you tell them not to get pregnant?
Dr. Sharman: It hasn’t come up all that much because most women, if they’re going to have kids, will do so before their mid-40s or even younger. The typical age of diagnosis of CLL is 72 with the first line of therapy typically at 74, so it’s not a common scenario. That said, I have had some young women, one or two in particular, who were diagnosed at childbearing potential. It’s fine to have kids. It doesn’t come up often, but it’s not a contraindication.
Addressing Side Effects with Your Doctor
Andrew: We had people who wrote that they had a back rash, a migraine, or this or that. Is it because of the drug they’re taking for CLL, is it the CLL, or is it something else? How do you determine if it’s the drug, the illness, or something else?
Dr. Sharman: There’s obviously no uniform answer to all of that. It’s going to take a close relationship with your oncologist. I always invite my patients to ask questions and do my best as a clinician to say, “Yep, I own that one,” or, “Nope, I don’t think that’s me,” and call balls and strikes. I figure if I’m honest with it and own up to something, then they’ll believe me when I say it’s not on me.
As doctors, we don’t always know. Sometimes it takes working it out together with your patient about how you solve this.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Even if I’ve done this for a long time, there are times when we don’t know. Sometimes you have to hold the drug for a little while, see if it gets better, restart it, and see if it comes back. You can do that with side effects that are of lower consequence. If it’s a major side effect, like a hemorrhage, that’s a different story altogether. As doctors, we don’t always know. Sometimes it takes working it out together with your patient about how you solve this.
What is Richter’s Transformation?
Andrew: Jeff, there’s a small percentage of patients where you talked about aggressive disease and there’s something called Richter’s Transformation. Could you explain that? One of the patients who wrote in is worried about that.
Dr. Sharman: Richter’s Transformation is a potential complication of CLL that is definitely more concerning. It’s generally when the CLL cell acquires a more aggressive behavior and becomes DLBCL, which is a different entity altogether. It requires a different treatment approach. Generally speaking, we reach for more traditional chemotherapy in that setting. In some cases, it can be fairly resistant to therapy. It’s a disease that can move very quickly.
Richter’s Transformation is rare… But if you’ve had the disease for 20 years, that risk starts to build up.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
If it’s suspected, the clinician has to jump into gear quickly. It requires a biopsy because you have to get a biopsy and prove that it’s not Richter’s Transformation quickly. Most often, you see a lymph node that’s swelling very quickly and disproportionate to the others. If you’re going to get a PET scan, it’s oftentimes bright on a PET scan. These are the things we’re thinking of as a clinician.
Fortunately, Richter’s Transformation is rare. It’s seen in about 1% of patients per year. But if you’ve had the disease for 20 years, that risk starts to build up. It probably hits a plateau at around 15 to 20%.
Sometimes, Richter’s Transformation is misdiagnosed. If you stop somebody on a BTK inhibitor, oftentimes their nodes will increase pretty quickly thereafter and in that circumstance, I’ve seen cases where Richter’s may have been inaccurately diagnosed. It requires a certain degree of suspicion if you’ve got a biopsy right after starting BTK inhibitors.
How Do Doctors Treat Younger Patients with CLL?
Andrew: I know this is complicated for people. We discussed that if you haven’t had treatment, you don’t treat the number; you look at the overall patient. You have a variety of medicines. BTK inhibitors are used by themselves or in combination, and there are different generations. We have clinical trials for some of these treatments mentioned at the 2024 ASH meeting. There are phase 1 trials for BTK degraders. CAR T-cell therapy is for people with more aggressive disease, although we’ll see if that creeps up a little earlier for younger patients.
Some people on Facebook, for instance, are under 50 with CLL and I know it’s not the most common. Is their age of diagnosis a bad thing? Are they going to have a rougher time with CLL because they’re diagnosed younger? Will they not live as long? What do you tell a younger patient based on their age?
Our therapies are as effective in younger individuals as they are in older individuals… we need to come up with something that’s going to keep this disease in control for quite a bit longer.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Dr. Sharman: For these patients, we have to plan not only for the next 10 to 15 years but also for the next 30 years. To some degree, we celebrate that we have a lot of new tools to control the disease. It is a reasonable question to ask: Can you use these tools to control it for twice as long or three times as long as somebody who’s diagnosed at age 80? It’s a different game plan.
Our therapies are as effective in younger individuals as they are in older individuals and in some cases, maybe even more effective in younger individuals. But it does require some thoughtfulness to think about the fact that we need to come up with something that’s going to keep this disease in control for quite a bit longer.
The field is moving so fast that the tools we’ll be using five to seven years from now may not even have been conceived of at this point. If somebody’s diagnosed younger, it’s fair to assume that there will be more tools in the tool shed down the road.
There’s a general misperception that you would only do a clinical trial if you’re running out of options but it’s not the case at all.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Considering a Clinical Trial for CLL
Andrew: Some of your patients are on clinical trials. When someone meets with their CLL doctor, should clinical trials be part of the discussion? Do you lay all this stuff out and then say what are in trials that they should consider as well?
Dr. Sharman: Andrew, we treated the very first CLL patient in the world with ibrutinib in my clinic and I’ve been a believer ever since. In many cases, we’re so grateful for patients who’ve volunteered for studies in the past because they’re the ones who’ve moved this field forward.
Clinical trials are not a one-size-fits-all scenario. There’s a general misperception that you would only do a clinical trial if you’re running out of options but it’s not the case at all. There are great studies for previously untreated patients, patients on first relapse, and patients who are resistant to certain treatments. In many cases, for the last 15 to 20 years, some of our best options have only been available in research studies.
It calls for a unique answer for every patient and what sort of studies might be available and accessible to them, but I would definitely like to dispel the notion that it’s only a therapy for patients who’ve run out of options.
Andrew: I was in a phase 2 trial in 2000 for FCR and it led to a 17-year remission, for which I’m very grateful. Would I have had that otherwise?
Concerns About Funding for CLL Research
Andrew: There are challenges about funding for research and researchers are worried. From the point of view of a CLL patient or CLL researcher, do you have a concern where that throws cold water on progress for CLL?
Dr. Sharman: It’s a great question and a sensitive discussion. People are going to have different opinions on this. The funding environment is shifting and I don’t know if we totally understand all the implications. It is worth noting that many studies are supported by the pharmaceutical industry. I know that the pharmaceutical industry is oftentimes considered a bad word, but they’ve been the friends that have brought us a lot of progress in the last handful of years.
The funding environment is shifting and I don’t know if we totally understand all the implications.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
For studies that are sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, these are oftentimes trying to develop a new drug or getting a new drug approved, so I don’t see much impact there. But when it comes to academic, university-based exploratory studies that are grant-funded, some of those will be impacted and some of the basic science research is up in the air right now. People don’t know if grants are going to be renewed or not. Amongst my academic colleagues, there is a great deal of concern and consternation about what the funding changes will mean. The whole story hasn’t been written yet, but like anything, it’s a nuanced answer where some areas will be affected more than others.
Andrew: How many years have you been at it, Jeff? How many years have you been in practice and seeing CLL patients?
Dr. Sharman: I finished my fellowship in 2008 at Stanford and I’ve been in practice in Eugene, Oregon, since then. Fellowship, residency, med school, and undergraduate studies all take a while. I don’t know where you start the clock, but I’m getting gray. How’s that?
Is There a Cure for CLL in Sight?
Andrew: I used to ask Dr. Keating, one of the grandfathers in Seattle, about this. Will we see a cure for CLL in your lifetime? Dr. Sharman, do you have hope for a cure?
Dr. Sharman: Unequivocally yes.
Andrew: I like that answer.
Dr. Sharman: I’ll leave it simple.
The world has changed in the last decade for what it means to be a patient with CLL and it is an area where I think hope is very reasonable.
Dr. Jeff Sharman
Andrew: I like that. When you put it all together, we have a variety of treatments that you can choose from with your patient based on their preference, your recommendations, and their clinical situation. We had some early- and later-stage research at the 2024 ASH meeting in December. Other meetings will happen during the year and then we’ll have ASH again, so we’ll get to talk again. You have different doublets and triplets, and even different ways of doing it. It sounds like there’s great hope for people.
Dr. Sharman: I couldn’t agree more, Andrew. I feel like the world has changed in the last decade for what it means to be a patient with CLL and it is an area where I think hope is very reasonable.
Conclusion
Andrew: Like you, I’ve been at this a while. I was diagnosed in 1996. I’ve seen some sick people, people who’ve been on clinical trials like me, and people on newer medicines. Most people are doing well. My CLL is at a very low level. You may be in long-term remission and though we may not be cured, go live your life. With Dr. Sharman and his colleagues doing the research and the studies that keep coming out, we have every reason to think that we can do that for a long time. Dr. Sharman, thank you so much for being with us and explaining all this.
Dr. Sharman: It’s my pleasure. Thank you so much, Andrew, and I look forward to future conversations.
Andrew: Remember: knowledge — and we’ve been getting some today — can be the best medicine of all.
Stephanie: Thank you, Andrew and Dr. Sharman, for leading this wonderful and very educational discussion at The Patient Story and taking the time out of your very busy schedules to provide such great insights.
Thank you once again to our sponsor, AbbVie, for supporting our independent patient education program. As always, we retain full editorial control. We want to point out some incredible resources from our friends at partner organizations, like The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and the CLL Society.
The LLS has a community section for people to meet and chat with other blood cancer patients and care partners; in this case, in CLL. The LLS offers many things, but one of the free resources is the Clinical Trial Support Center. It’s free, one-on-one personal guidance throughout the process before, during, and after clinical trials, which, as we know, can be a lot.
The CLL Society has a lot of great programs, too. It’s dedicated to the CLL community and offers programs like Expert Access™, connecting patients to world-renowned CLL experts for a free virtual second opinion, which is so important, especially with all the things that are going on, as you can see from this discussion.
I hope this program was helpful and that you walk away with more knowledge and questions to ask your doctors. Thank you for coming and we hope to see you at another program. Take good care.
Webinar: CLL Treatment Advances: Moving From Research to Reality
Hosted by The Patient Story
The world of CLL treatment is evolving fast. This program breaks down the most important updates from recent research and clinical trials. Learn what’s changing, how it impacts treatment decisions, and what it all means for patients today.
Losing a Testicle, Not My Identity: Rob’s Stage 3 Testicular Cancer Story
Diagnosed at 20, Rob faced the immense physical and emotional weight of stage 3C testicular cancer. An avid fitness enthusiast, he dedicated much of his time and energy to the gym until persistent back pain disrupted his routine. He initially dismissed his symptoms as being due to a weightlifting injury, but they worsened over weeks, leading to loss of appetite and eventually vomiting blood. A visit to the emergency room revealed the shocking truth: cancer had spread throughout his body.
Interviewed by: Taylor Scheib Edited by: Katrina Villareal
Initially, the gravity of Rob’s diagnosis didn’t fully register. While the word “cancer” carried the terrifying connotation of death, his doctor’s reassuring demeanor helped ease his fears. However, as treatment progressed, the reality of his diagnosis set in, bringing waves of emotional highs and lows. He remained composed in the beginning, taking it one day at a time, but the mental toll deepened as he saw the effects of chemotherapy and surgery unfold.
Chemotherapy for stage 3C testicular cancer proved grueling for Rob, both physically and mentally. With a PICC line limiting his physical activity, he struggled with the inability to engage in his passion for working out. The treatment took a severe toll on his body, leading to extreme nausea, violent vomiting, and an overwhelming sense of exhaustion. As rounds of chemo progressed, the side effects intensified, making even the smallest tasks feel insurmountable. Losing his hair became one of the most challenging aspects. It wasn’t just about appearance; it was about identity. The loss of eyebrows and eyelashes made him look undeniably sick, which shook his confidence. Even when he felt physically well, he avoided going out, fearing the stares and silent judgments from others.
Beyond physical changes, cancer forced Rob to reevaluate his identity as a man. The orchiectomy meant losing a testicle, something he initially didn’t dwell on until after the surgery. Opting for a prosthetic was a practical decision, but it didn’t erase the feeling of loss. There were moments of deep insecurity, worrying about how this change would impact his body and sense of masculinity. However, he shifted his perspective, choosing humor over despair. Instead of dwelling on what was lost, he focused on what remained—his resilience, his health, and his ability to move forward.
Rob’s faith became a significant source of strength. Before his stage 3C testicular cancer diagnosis, practicing his faith was merely a tradition observed on Christmas and Easter, but the comfort of prayer provided a newfound sense of peace. It helped him manage anxiety and embrace hope during the darkest times.
Despite the physical hardships Rob faced, including an unexpectedly intense and complicated surgery, the most emotional moments came with good news. Hearing that all 58 tumors removed during surgery were completely dead was a moment of overwhelming relief. Being declared in remission brought tears of joy, making every struggle worthwhile.
Now, he approaches life with renewed gratitude. The experience has reshaped his outlook, making him appreciate health, support, and the ability to return to the gym. His advice to others is simple yet profound: don’t let negative thoughts spiral out of control, take life one day at a time, and recognize the love and support around you.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.
Why We Should Listen to Our Bodies: Kristin’s Stage 2 Colon Cancer Experience
Kristin was diagnosed with stage 2 colon cancer in July 2021 at age 46. Her health issues began much earlier, as she had suffered from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) since her teenage years. However, in March 2021, her symptoms became more severe. She experienced bloating, discomfort, and unpredictable bowel habits. What initially seemed like a bad IBS flare-up soon escalated when she started experiencing persistent pain on the lower right side of her abdomen. Concerned it might be appendicitis, she sought medical attention. A CT scan showed a heavy fecal load and she was advised to take laxatives. However, the pain persisted and then subsided temporarily.
By June 2021, the pain returned. After discussing her symptoms with her sister, who had endometriosis, she sought a hormone specialist. After assessing her symptoms and performing a physical exam, the doctor diagnosed her with severe endometriosis and recommended a hysterectomy. As her symptoms worsened, now including fever, nausea, and unbearable pain, she went to the emergency room. There, an ultrasound revealed fluid buildup, leading doctors to suspect a ruptured appendix. A subsequent CT scan showed a large mass and a bowel obstruction.
During an emergency surgery, doctors found a 5 cm tumor wrapped around her right ovary and fallopian tube. Moreover, part of her small intestine was perforated, requiring surgical repair. Additionally, the tumor was also adhered to her stomach, necessitating careful removal. At first, doctors were uncertain if it was cancerous; however, pathology results confirmed stage 2 colon cancer. Fortunately, all 40 lymph nodes tested were clear, indicating no spread.
Following surgery, Kristin then had to decide whether to undergo chemotherapy. Her oncologist left the decision up to her, and she opted for four months of chemotherapy. The treatment process was challenging. She experienced severe mouth sores, dehydration, and neuropathy, making it difficult to tolerate cold foods or drinks. Although she found the infusion center to be a place of comfort, the treatment nevertheless took a significant physical and emotional toll on her.
Kristin completed her final chemotherapy session in January 2022, considering that day her cancer-free milestone. A follow-up scan in February confirmed no evidence of disease. While grateful for her recovery, she acknowledges the lasting impact of the experience. After all, it took three years to feel fully herself again. Even though the uncertainty of recurrence lingers, she nevertheless focuses on gratitude and staying present.
Kristin’s perspective on health advocacy has shifted. She emphasizes the importance of listening to one’s body and pushing for necessary tests. Reflecting on her past digestive issues, she believes a colonoscopy at a younger age could have prevented her diagnosis. She now encourages others to advocate for their health and explore different treatment options. Kristin also experienced deep personal loss when her best friend, Felicia, passed away from stage 4 breast cancer in 2024. Nevertheless, despite the hardship, she remains hopeful and determined to embrace life, as she recognizes the importance of perseverance and self-advocacy.
Name: Kristin T.
Age at Diagnosis:
46
Diagnosis:
Colon Cancer
Staging:
Stage 2
Symptoms:
Chronic digestive issues
Bloating
Abdominal pain
Unpredictable bowel habits
Unexplained weight gain
Nausea
Fever
Treatments:
Surgeries: removal of the tumor, right ovary, right fallopian tube, and part of the small intestine
Chemotherapy
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.
Symptoms: Abdominal pressure, fatigue, small amounts of blood in stool Treatments: Surgery (colon resection), chemotherapy (FOLFOX: folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin)
How Misdiagnoses Delayed Amanda’s Stage 3 Cervical Cancer Diagnosis
Amanda was diagnosed with stage 3 cervical cancer at 28. The cancer had spread to her lymph nodes and, later, to her abdomen. She initially experienced heavy periods, severe cramping, and intense premenstrual symptoms, which she attributed to normal menstrual irregularities. Over time, her symptoms worsened—she began experiencing abnormal bleeding, large blood clots, and severe pain in her lower abdomen and left leg. She even experienced loss of mobility in her left leg and, additionally, loss of appetite and extreme fatigue.
Amanda visited the emergency room and walk-in clinics multiple times, but doctors repeatedly misdiagnosed her with ovarian cysts, diverticulosis, or kidney stones. It wasn’t until an ER nurse performed thorough diagnostic testing that a mass was detected through a pelvic ultrasound. Amanda was referred to a gynecologist, who dismissed her concerns. Frustrated and desperate for answers, she traveled four hours to Stanford to see a gynecologic oncologist.
During a pelvic exam, the gynecologic oncologist immediately recognized the presence of cancer. Subsequently, a biopsy confirmed that Amanda had stage 3 cervical cancer. As a result, she was admitted to the hospital for 11 days, during which she received a kidney stent to address blockages caused by the tumor and a port placement for chemotherapy treatments.
Amanda underwent an aggressive cervical cancer treatment plan that included chemotherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and brachytherapy, a targeted internal radiation procedure. The combination of chemo and radiation left her exhausted, nauseous, and unable to eat much; however, she was thankful that she did not lose her hair. Moreover, brachytherapy was especially difficult. It required a spinal epidural, followed by the insertion of metal rods into her cervix to deliver direct radiation. The sessions were painful and left her fatigued and nauseous.
Doctors declared Amanda in remission three months after treatment. However, at her six-month scan, doctors discovered that the cancer had returned. Feeling utterly devastated, she nevertheless underwent another round of chemotherapy and radiation. Fortunately, nine months later, she was once again in remission.
Amanda’s cancer left her unable to have more children, which was an emotional loss. As an only child, she had hoped to give her daughter a sibling. Her experience, as a result, also reshaped her perspective on healthcare—she learned the importance of self-advocacy and, consequently, now urges women to stay proactive about their gynecological health. Through sharing her story on TikTok, she has helped educate others on the importance of routine check-ups and pap smears. Amanda hopes that, as a result, her experience encourages other women to listen to their bodies and, more importantly, push for answers when something feels wrong.
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.
Symptoms: Heavy periods, abnormal bleeding, large blood clots, severe cramping, severe abdominal pain, pain radiating down the left leg, loss of mobility in the left leg, loss of appetite, fatigue
Symptoms: Intermittent spotting during or after sex, unpredictable menstrual cycle, abdominal pain particularly under the rib cage Treatments: Chemotherapy (cisplatin & paclitaxel), immunotherapy (Keytruda), surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy & omentectomy) ...
Hamish’s Rare Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors (DSRCT) Story
At 25, Hamish was diagnosed with desmoplastic small round cell tumors (DSRCT), a rare and aggressive sarcoma (cancer that starts in the body’s soft tissues or bones, like muscles, fat, or blood vessels). His diagnosis followed months of fatigue, weight loss, and nausea, initially dismissed as long COVID or dietary issues, until he discovered a lump in his abdomen. Swift action by his general practitioner, including a CT scan and biopsy, confirmed the diagnosis and revealed stage 4 cancer with tumors in his abdomen and a lymph node above the diaphragm.
Interviewed by: Taylor Scheib Edited by: Katrina Villareal
Despite the daunting statistics surrounding desmoplastic small round cell tumors (DSRCT), Hamish remained hopeful, focusing on his relatively favorable position: no organ involvement and early detection. His oncologist initiated an intensive treatment regimen, including interval-compressed chemotherapy, followed by cytoreductive surgery, a peritonectomy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), right hemicolectomy, and low anterior resection. The surgery successfully removed all visible tumors, marking a significant milestone in his treatment.
Hamish credits the support of healthcare professionals, particularly oncology nurses, his family, and friends, for helping him navigate the emotional and physical toll of cancer. He emphasizes the importance of finding joy, staying connected, and seeking hope even in uncertainty. Reflecting on his experience, Hamish shares that positivity doesn’t always mean optimism but rather embracing vulnerability, caring for others, and cherishing meaningful connections. His most recent PET scan showed no evidence of disease, a moment of relief and encouragement.
As humans, as natural humans, we need hope.
Through his story, Hamish aims to inspire others to radically embrace hope, build support networks, and find strength in both community and perspective.
Name: Hamish S.
Age at Diagnosis:
25
Diagnosis:
Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT)
Staging:
Stage 4
Symptoms:
Persistent fatigue
Nausea
Unexplained weight loss
Discovery of a hard abdominal lump
Treatments:
Interval-compressed chemotherapy
Surgeries: cytoreductive surgery, peritonectomy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), right hemicolectomy, and low anterior resection
This interview has been edited for clarity and length. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider to make informed treatment decisions.
The views and opinions expressed in this interview do not necessarily reflect those of The Patient Story.