Categories
Cancers FAQ Multiple Myeloma Specialist

How Does Sugar and Soda Affect Cancer Patients

Navigating the Sweet and Bubbly as a Cancer Patient

Dr. Urvi Shah Shares the Impact of Sugar and Soda on Cancer Patients

As you navigate your cancer journey, questions about diet often bubble to the surface. Dr. Urvi Shah, is a board-certified hematologist-oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering and a Hodkin lymphoma patient. Dr. Shah led a clinical trial studying the effects of a plant-based diet on cancer patients. She sheds light on the relationship between sugar, soda, and overall diet. In this interview, Dr. Shah provides insight into the effects of diet on cancer.


This interview has been edited for clarity. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider for treatment decisions.


Do diet sodas increase the risk or progression of cancer? 

Dr. Shah: When we talk about artificial beverages or sugar-sweetened drinks, there’s also been a lot of data around aspartame and some of these things in terms of drinks. The data is a bit mixed, where the recent findings from some groups have suggested that it might be a carcinogen, and others have said that the data is not enough to call it that. I think irrespective of whatever that is, drinking those drinks has not led to patients actually having a lower BMI or losing weight in itself. I think that overall, trying to avoid either artificial or sugar-sweetened beverages is important.

Whether sugar feeds cancer is a very common thought that patients propagate.

Dr. Urivi Shah

Should sugar be avoided to reduce cancer progression and risk?

Dr. Shah: Whether sugar feeds cancer is a very common thought that patients propagate. I think the answer is somewhat nuanced or lies in between. When we think about sugar, sugar is a refined carbohydrate.

Carbohydrates, in general, are a food group that we shouldn’t be excluded just because we are worried about the risk of cancer. There are complex carbohydrates, like whole grains, that are actually associated with reduced cancer risk in many population studies. It is important to include complex carbohydrates in one’s diet and not think about excluding those.

Simultaneously, refined carbohydrates like sugary drinks, sugar-sweetened beverages, those are associated with inflammation, insulin resistance, obesity, and risk of cancer. I think that when we’re thinking about sugar, yes, we want to limit the sugary drinks, the processed foods, the cakes and cookies, and things like that and reduce it. 

What is the daily recommended amount of sugar?

Dr. Shah: One fun fact is that the US population on average eats about 17 teaspoons of sugar a day. That’s on average, so there are a lot of people much higher than 17 teaspoons. Sugar is something we all don’t really need, like refined sugar. Even if we were, the recommendation would be to limit it to 6 to 9 teaspoons – 6 for females and 9 for males – per day. We’re almost 3 times above that limit already on average. You can think that many people who are way higher. 

How can patients reduce their refined sugar intake?

Dr. Shah: A lot of sugar comes in hidden foods and you don’t realize it. Cereals and things will have a lot of added sugar. It’s important to learn how to read labels and try to at least not be eating the added sugar or the refined sugar. I would not avoid complex carbohydrates because they come with the fiber. They come with vitamins, nutrients, and other things that are actually quite health-promoting. 

Do you think there is a gap between what patients and doctors are taught about nutrition and cancer?

Dr. Shah: Through my experience, I did realize that I had a lot of friends and family members trying to tell me what to eat and what not to eat. I realized that we, as oncologists and even medical professionals, don’t hear enough about this in our training, and we don’t even study this properly. It became a side hobby of mine, as you might say, where I would read about these topics quite often and found it really fascinating that there’s so much literature out there, but we’re not really translating it directly for the patients. 

I never really thought about how I could merge this side hobby with my professional career. I did a lot of research in genetics, epigenetics, immune therapies. Then when I moved to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, first as an immunotherapy fellow and then as faculty, I actually was doing more work in CAR-T cell therapies and bispecific therapies, so different kinds of immune therapies. 

Can you tell us about the trial studying the effects of a high-fiber, plant-based diet on mGUS?

Dr. Shah: Given my interest on the side, I always knew I wanted to do at least one trial in this area and see where it goes. When I started as faculty, we developed a new prevention trial. This trial was basically looking at a high-fiber plant-based diet and the effects on mGUS or monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance and smoldering myeloma. Can this delay risk of progression to multiple myeloma, a blood cancer? 

We do know that these precursor disorders of mGUS and smoldering myeloma increase the risk to develop myeloma, and they’re pretty common in the general population of over 3% in people over the age of 50 years. It’s not that uncommon, but we don’t recommend checking this for everybody. Once patients are checked, they are a bit anxious to know, what do we do about this? The standard of care currently is observation, meaning we do nothing until it does become a blood cancer. 

Can healthier eating and weight loss reduce the risk of cancer progression?

Dr. Shah: We do know from other studies that have looked at associations, that people who have an elevated body mass index (BMI) are twice as likely to progress to myeloma than somebody who has a normal body mass index. We already know that the risk is doubled with just BMI. What we don’t know, and we have not studied so far was, if we help patients lose weight and eat better, will that risk reduce for patients? 

What we saw was that patients actually had a reduction in body mass index of about 8% at 3 months, and they were eating to satiety.

Dr. Shah
Can you explain the study’s methods?

Dr. Shah: The premise of our study was looking at a 3-month, high-fiber, plant-based diet. We shipped the patient’s lunch and dinner. We also provided them snacks and breakfast ideas and we had a dietitian working with them very closely for 3 months.

Then we had 6 months of coaching total – 3 months during the intervention and 3 months after. We followed them for a year on the study. This was our first study, so it was only a 20 patient study looking at feasibility to understand is it possible to do this intervention? Does it have any effects on weight, on compliance, and can patients do this? 

What were the results of the study?

Dr. Shah: What we saw was that patients actually had a reduction in body mass index of about 8% at 3 months, and they were eating to satiety. We did not ask patients to calorie restrict, because I think it’s important that we don’t focus on what we can’t eat, but focus on what we can and eat till we are full. We had patients eat as much as they wanted, as long as they were eating high-fiber, plant-based foods and unprocessed foods. Despite that, patients with an elevated BMI were able to move their BMI towards a normal BMI. 

With this weight loss, we also saw an improvement in compliance very significantly, where the median fiber intake was below the RDA for these patients before the study, and it improved to above the RDA in the study. Meaning, the recommended daily allowance of about 30 g or 25 g. 

What we also saw was the compliance. We calculated the percentage of calories that were unprocessed plant foods and we looked at, did this improve over time? We saw that at the start of the study, before the patient started the study, their unprocessed plant food intake was only about 20% of their calories. This is very typical of a standard Western diet, so nothing different than most patients. This improved to 90% on the intervention and even a year after remained high at 70%. We saw that the patients that made the changes were able to sustain them pretty much long term because they saw the benefits. 

Across the board, the patients who responded, all of them said if there was another study, they would be glad to participate

Dr. Shah

Measuring quality of life for study participants 

Dr. Shah: Another question that doctors and patients ask is, are these changes something that’s feasible? Will a patient be able to do it? Does it affect their quality of life? Do they enjoy it? We actually checked quality of life by serving patients through the study. We actually saw an improvement in global health status dyspnea or shortness of breath and fatigue scores across the time. 

We also looked at things like surveying them and said, would you do this study again if we offered it to you? Or, how difficult was the study to do? Across the board, the patients who responded, all of them said if there was another study, they would be glad to participate. We also saw that patients saw an improvement in many different aspects of their health, like self-confidence, body mass index, and some had improvements in arthritis or back pain. There were small changes that helped patients across different symptoms. Overall, just eating better. 

Amongst all the patients, they all said that the study was somewhat easy or very easy to follow, but none of them said it was difficult. That was encouraging too, that patients were able to make these changes, and some of them were able to sustain them long term. 

Where there improvements in insulin resistance?

Dr. Shah: Other things we looked at, we try to look at correlatives, meaning looking at blood and stool biomarkers that we know are associated with cancer progression. We know things like insulin resistance, for instance, is associated with progression of cancer. We saw that insulin resistance actually improved on the study despite these patients eating more carbs than ever. But because these are complex carbohydrates, there was actually an improvement in insulin resistance.

We had one patient actually on insulin for 30 years and was able to stop it within a month on the study and now 2 years out, has not needed insulin again. It is possible for patients to reverse some of these metabolic disorders and actually feel better with time. 

What were the effects of a high-fiber, plant-based diet on microbiome diversity?

Dr. Shah: We also saw an improvement in the microbiome profile. If you’ve followed a lot of cancer data on the microbiome, one common theme pops up every time. That theme is that higher microbiome diversity – meaning many different kinds of bacteria in the microbiome, so a variety. If you think about a healthy rainforest compared to a forest with just palm trees, the healthy rainforest, or the one with microbiome diversity, is what’s associated with improved progression-free survival and overall survival over and over again in different cancers. 

We have not yet shown in a population that has a precursor to cancer, can we really, with a dietary intervention, improve this diversity and sustain it? In our study, we saw that within 3 months patients had an improvement in their stool microbiome diversity. We also looked at it from baseline to 1 year and it was sustained improved. Even though the intervention was only 3 months, we still saw the benefit at a year because these patients were continuing to keep at least some of these changes going. 

Were there any changes in inflammation?

Dr. Shah: Other things we saw as we looked at changes in inflammation, we saw some improvement in some subsets of the immune cells as well. We’re doing a lot of more detailed analysis with these samples and hoping to put it together as a paper in the next year. We presented some of the findings at the American Society of Hematology meeting.

Did this diet delay the progression of cancer? 

Dr. Shah: The last question many would ask is, all these are good in terms of biomarkers, but did it really delay the progression of the cancer? These were 20 patients so it’s a small study and some had really small low level disease. We can’t expect in a year to see changes in such low level disease for patients. 

Otherwise, there were other patients, 2 of them who had rising M-spikes. So for the past 5 years, their M-spike had slowly been increasing. What we did see is on the intervention with the weight loss and the dietary changes, their M-spike, or the protein that we follow for the disease or the plasma cell disorder, had stabilized. So for these 2 patients who actually lost more than 10% body weight over time and also maintained the dietary changes, we saw a stabilization of their disease that was rising for 5 years before. 

We calculated significance with p values before and after and we do see a change in the trajectory of the disease. I think that diet and the microbiome, insulin resistance, and all of these things can make a big difference in cancer risk and progression. I think we’re just trying to learn a lot about this and bring it to patients.

How can people diversify their microbiome? 

Dr. Shah: If we think about microbiome health, gut microbiome health, like I said, the theme that pops up is diversity. Having a diversity of bacteria. If you’re thinking about diverse bacteria, think about each bacteria needing different foods to survive. You want to eat a diversity of food because that feeds different bacteria. 

Dr. Shah: There’s been a study with over 10,000 stool samples from 10,000 individuals and they looked at who has higher diversity compared to who has lower diversity based on the foods they eat and this was healthy individuals.

I don’t see why what’s in healthy individuals shouldn’t at least somewhat apply to patients with cancer. But what they saw was that patients who ate more than 30 types of plant foods per week, and when I say 30 types, I’m not talking about broccoli 30 times. I’m talking about broccoli, chickpeas, red beans, pinto beans, herbs, spices, whole grains, nuts, seeds, and all of those things. 30 different types of them, compared to those who ate less than 10 plant foods per week, had an increased diversity of their microbiome. 

What are some tips for improving one’s diet?

Dr. Shah: I think one very quick thing that patients can think about implementing is how do you go outside your comfort zone and buy different plant foods that you may not be comfortable eating or used to? Not just eating the same sides of broccoli or potatoes or something that you’re used to, but trying different things.

I do think that taste buds adapt with time, and we do get used to different foods. We’ve seen this on the study time and again, where patients initially find it hard to do it in the first few weeks, but once they do it long enough, they feel like it’s much easier to manage because they’re now used to these tastes and foods. That’s one quick tip. 

Another one would be dietary fiber. If you think about the US population, the average American gets about 10 to 15g of fiber in their diet. There’s a survey been done from the NHANES and they asked a set of the US population and said, “How many of you think you get enough fiber in your diet?” 67% people said, “Yes, we get enough fiber.” In reality, only 5% do. There’s this big disconnect where people think they’re getting enough fiber, but they’re not. 

Dietary fiber is really food for the microbiome. When you think about it that way, I think it would be very important to make sure you’re getting at least 25 to 30g of fiber a day. I’m not talking about fiber supplements, but dietary fiber, so think about foods you’re eating. Fiber only comes from plant foods, so try to up that intake of the fiber in your diet. I think those two things are very powerful. 

Another one could be looking at fermented foods and increasing the consumption of those. There have been microbiome studies showing how fermented foods reduce inflammation and also improve diversity. That could be another aspect of change to think about. 

What are some common, healthy fermented foods?

Dr. Shah: Fermented foods are things like kimchi, kombucha, yogurt. Those would be some of the common ones. Sauerkraut, things like that.

What are some common high-fiber plants? 

Dr. Shah: For fiber, I think beans. Beans or legumes are one of the most underrated best foods ever because they are longevity foods. Many of the longest-living populations actually eat a lot of beans, and we don’t really see most people eating them. One cup of beans has 15g of protein and 15g of fiber. 

A very simple fix for a patient would be, if they were getting the average American diet and having 10 to 15g of fiber in their diet, eat one cup of beans and you reach 30g of fiber already. It’s a very quick fix in that sense. In a cancer patient, if they need a little more protein or energy, beans are a good source of that too. Other foods that are good or healthy are cruciferous vegetables. Broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and cauliflower.

More about cancer health and wellness

Chemo Diet: Eating Healthy During Cancer Treatment | The Patient Story

It can be hard to stay healthy and in balance when you're going through chemotherapy. Here are some ways you can optimize your eating habits to alleviate some common chemotherapy side effects...

CBD Oil for Cancer & Treatment Side Effects

Unlike THC, CBD does not make a person feel “high.” Read on to learn more about CBD, its potential uses for cancer patients, and tips on finding the right product...

Yoga and Cancer, Meditation for Cancer

Wondering how a yoga or meditation practice can help in cancer treatment? Read the benefits of starting a practice, both for your mental and physical health, and get tips on how to start...
Chef Ryan Scott feature

Chef Ryan Scott’s Cancer Story

Chef Ryan Scott’s Cancer Story You may have seen him compete on Top Chef or on network TV morning shows like The Today Show, but in this special clip, Chef Ryan Scott does more than share a recipe. He shares his own personal colon cancer story, describing how he was just a kid when he...
cannabis

Should I Start Using Cannabis as Part of My Cancer Treatment Plan?

Find out if using cannabis as a way to manage cancer symptoms is a good option for you and which methods of ingestion are best...
Categories
Medical Experts Medical Update Article

How Long Can You Live with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

How Long Can You Live with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

Dr. Adam Kittai and Dr. Joanna Rhodes share their thoughts on CLL life expectancy

Receiving a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) diagnosis is likely to lead to a very human question: How long can I or my loved one live with CLL? To answer that question, we went directly to two CLL experts who have seen patients at all different stages.

In this conversation, Dr. Adam Kittai from The Ohio State University – The James, and Dr. Joanna Rhodes from Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey share their insight and expertise on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), offering a comprehensive understanding of the disease landscape. Through their combined knowledge, they shed light on factors influencing the lifespan of individuals with CLL, such as disease biology, genetic tests, and age at diagnosis.

Together, Dr. Rhodes and Dr. Kittai impart not only scientific insights but also a sense of hope, emphasizing the personalized nature of each CLL journey.


People can live decades with CLL, and they can live decades without needing treatment. Everyone’s a little bit different.

Dr. Joanna Rhodes


This interview has been edited for clarity. This is not medical advice. Please consult with your healthcare provider for treatment decisions.



How long can individuals live with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and what factors contribute to the variation in life expectancy?

Dr. Joanna Rhodes: People can live decades with CLL, and they can live decades without needing treatment. Everyone’s a little bit different. Some of that has to do with the age at which you’re diagnosed, some of it has to do with your disease biology, and some of that can be told by genetic tests that we send on your CLL. It gives me an idea of how I think your CLL is going to behave potentially over time. Some of that we can tell also within the first couple of years by what your blood counts do over time.

Could you elaborate on the significance of changes in white blood cell count for individuals with CLL?

Dr. Joanna Rhodes: Now, the natural course of CLL is eventually, your white blood cell count will go up. The first time that happens, it feels very scary for sure because you don’t know how that’s going to happen over time. But your white blood cell count going up doesn’t mean it might not come back down. CLL cells are pretty reactive, so if anything is going on, if you have an infection or if you had surgery, your white blood cell count can go up. It doesn’t mean it’ll stay that high. It can go back down. That’s something that we see pretty commonly in clinical practice.

»MORE: Hear directly from patients living well with CLL

What can you tell us about specific survival rates and life expectancy for people with CLL?

Dr. Joanna Rhodes: According to SEER, which is our National Cancer Institute data, the five-year survival rate currently for CLL is around 89%. That means at five years, 89% of people who were diagnosed with CLL are still alive. What we don’t always know is where the 11% death rate is from because the median age of diagnosis of CLL is 70. As we get older, other things can happen, like heart disease, hypertension, and motor vehicle accidents. It doesn’t necessarily take into account exactly why patients who have CLL are passing away.

Susan K. feature profile

“Get creative and try to find ways to bring joy to your life and happiness because life is short for all of us. No one knows what the next five seconds are going to bring so just live your life and enjoy your life”

Susan K. | Explore her CLL story

How do you approach discussing survival statistics with patients, considering the emotional impact it may have?

Dr. Joanna Rhodes: That’s also a hard statistic to hear, so one of the ways that I frame this for patients is that while we have statistics, that’s taking a whole group of people and figuring out the trend. The only person that matters is you. You’re what we call an n-of-1, and so that’s important to remember. Just because there’s a number out there doesn’t necessarily mean that number relates to what your story is going to be and what your journey is going to be.

Dr. Kittai, can you share some insights on what to expect regarding survival rates for individuals with CLL??

Dr. Kittai: One of the questions I hear is the average age of death of CLL patients. There was an interesting study that was presented at iwCLL that looked at all patients who were treated in modern-day clinical trials. These are patients who require treatment. They did a study where they took all those patients and matched them to age-matched controls in the general population. The overall survival of the two groups was practically equal.

With treatment, patients were getting very, very close to their life expectancy. Remember, these are all clinical trials so it’s going to seem a little bit low. It was 52 to 55 months versus age-matched controls which was 56 months. Once again, it was age-matched controls, so they matched the population to age-matched controls to general society, and the difference was only by a few months. That tells us that our patients with CLL are living very close to the normal life expectancy, even if they require treatment with our new therapies, which is great news.


CLL Patient Stories

Susan K. feature profile

Susan K.



Symptoms: Swollen lymph nodes on the neck, high white blood count
Treatment: Venetoclax & obinutuzumab

Hannah D.



Symptoms: Fatigue, high WBC



Treatment: Imbruvica, venetoclax
Andrew SchorrDiagnosis: Myelofibrosis, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)Treatment: Clinical trial, Gazyva, Jakafi, Increbic, Reblozyl and steroids

Jeff F.



Symptoms: Fatigue, night sweats



Treatment: Clinical trial (ofatumumab)


Categories
Latest News & Research

Significant Disparity: Myeloma Real-World Results Show Striking Contrast with Clinical Trials

Worse Outcomes for Myeloma Patients in Real-World Results vs. Clinical Trials

Multiple myeloma patient outcomes are strikingly different in the real-world versus controlled environments according to data presented at the ASH Conference 2023 (Abstract 541). In the real world, multiple myeloma patients demonstrated a 44% reduction in progression-free survival (PFS) and a 75% decrease in overall survival (OS) compared to participants in clinical trials.

The study titled “Comparison of the Efficacy in Clinical Trials Versus Effectiveness in the Real-World of Treatments for Multiple Myeloma: A Population-Based Cohort Study” explores the gap between clinical trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness of treatments for multiple myeloma.

Conducted by a team led by Dr. Alissa Visram, the research focused on assessing the outcomes of patients treated with standard-of-care multiple myeloma regimens in routine practice compared to those in registration phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Key Findings:

  1. Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap: Real-world (RW) patients experienced a 44% worse progression-free survival (PFS) and a 75% worse overall survival (OS) compared to RCT patients across various multiple myeloma regimens.
  2. Patient Characteristics: RW patients were generally older, and for relapsed regimens, there was a longer time between multiple myeloma diagnosis and the start of the regimen in the real-world compared to RCTs.
  3. Regimen Performance: Most multiple myeloma regimens evaluated showed worse PFS and OS in the real-world setting, except for pomalidomide/dex (Pd), which demonstrated a trend towards better performance.
  4. Safety Profile: The safety profile, measured by inpatient hospitalization rates during treatment, was comparable between the real-world cohort and reported serious adverse events (AEs) in RCTs.

Implications: The study emphasizes the significant efficacy-effectiveness gap between registration RCTs and real-world usage of multiple myeloma regimens. The findings underscore the importance of ongoing evaluation of real-world data to inform clinicians and patients for shared treatment decision-making.

Find out more

This link will take you to an external site

Patient Stories by Multiple Myeloma Type

Explore our multiple myeloma stories below, where patients describe things like:

  • First myeloma symptoms
  • What treatments they underwent
  • Living with multiple myeloma

Active myeloma

Clay

Clay D., Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma



Symptoms: Persistent kidney issues, nausea

Treatments: Chemotherapy (CyBorD, KRd, VDPace), radiation, stem cell transplant (autologous & allogeneic), targeted therapy (daratumumab), immunotherapy (elotuzumab)
...
Melissa

Melissa V., Multiple Myeloma, Stage 3



Symptoms: Frequent infections

Treatments: IVF treatment & chemotherapy (RVD) for 7 rounds
...

Elise D., Refractory Multiple Myeloma



Symptoms: Lower back pain, fractured sacrum

Treatments: CyBorD, Clinical trial of Xpovio (selinexor)+ Kyprolis (carfilzomib) + dexamethasone
...
Marti P multiple myeloma

Marti P., Multiple Myeloma, Stage 3



Symptoms: Dizziness, confusion, fatigue, vomiting, hives



Treatments: Chemotherapy (bortezomib & velcade), daratumumab/Darzalex, lenalidomide, revlimid, & stem cell transplant
...
Ray H. feature

Ray H., Multiple Myeloma, Stage 3



Symptoms: Hemorrhoids, low red blood cell count

Treatments: Immunotherapy, chemotherapy, stem cell transplant
...

Typical myeloma

The majority of people diagnosed with myeloma fall under this category:

  • IgG k (kappa)
  • IgG λ (lambda)
  • IgA k (kappa)
  • IgA λ (lambda)


Tim H., Multiple Myeloma



Symptoms: None that could be identified; cancer found through CT scan for gallbladder removal

Treatment: Chemotherapy: Revlimid, Velcade, and Dexamethasone; Darzalex, Kyprolis, and Dexamethasone; Stem cell transplant)

Scott

Scott C., Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Stage 3



Symptoms: Pain in hips and ribs, night sweats, weight loss, nausea

Treatment: Clinical trial, chemo, kyphoplasty, stem cell transplant
Jude

Jude A., Multiple Myeloma, Stage 3



Symptoms: Pain in back, hips and ribs; difficulty walking

Treatment: Bilateral femoral osteotomy, reversal due to infection; chemotherapy

Light chain myeloma

It’s estimated that light chain myeloma makes up about 15% of all myeloma diagnoses. There are times when malignant plasma cells produce only the light chain component of the antibody. Patients diagnosed with these cases have what’s known as “light chain myeloma.”


Carlos C.



Diagnosis: Multiple myeloma, Light Chain, Stage 2
1st Symptoms:
Back pain and spasms
Treatment:
Back surgery to fuse T1 and T2, chemotherapy (RVD) and stem cell transplant

Non-secretory myeloma


Beth A.



Diagnosis: Multiple myeloma, relapsed/refractory
Subtype: Non-secretory (1-5% of myelomas)
1st Symptoms: Extreme pain between shoulder blades, sternum, head, burning sensation
1st Line Treatment: VAD chemo, radiation, stem cell transplant
RR Treatment: 8 chemo regimens, successful combo→selinexor+bortezomib+dexamethasone

Inactive myeloma

Smoldering myeloma


Maui B.



Diagnosis: Smoldering myeloma
Cancer Details:
Smoldering myeloma is pre-symptomatic or pre-treatment multiple myeloma
1st Symptoms:
Inflammatory eye disease, uterine bleeding
Treatment:
N/A
...

Brad H., Smoldering High-Risk Multiple Myeloma



Symptoms: Abnormal kidney function (stage 2 kidney disease), mild anemia
...

Categories
Medical Experts

Should Cancer Patients Reconsider CAR T-cell Therapy?

Should Cancer Patients Reconsider CAR T-cell Therapy?

Explore CAR T-cell therapy insights with Dr. Joshua Brody amid FDA investigation.

https://youtu.be/swIpc_DeMtM

The headlines about the recent FDA investigation into CAR T-cell therapy have raised questions about the cancer treatment for many patients.

To provide some answers, we sat down with Dr. Joshua Brody, Director of the Lymphoma Immunotherapy Program at The Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai, at the ASH conference in San Diego 2023.

Dr. Brody live from ASH conference 2023

As background, the FDA is investigating T-cell malignancies associated with BCMA- or CD19-directed autologous CAR T-cell immunotherapies.

Dr. Brody addresses pertinent questions about CAR T-cell therapy. Given the ongoing evaluation of the identified risk of T-cell malignancy and the potential serious outcomes, including hospitalization and death, patients and their caregivers must stay updated.

In this Q&A with Dr. Brody, we aim to empower patients to make informed decisions. Understanding the risks and benefits, the personalized nature of the treatment, and the latest advancements in cancer immunotherapy become paramount.


What prompted the recent FDA investigation into CAR T-Cell therapy?

Dr. Joshua Brody: The FDA starting a new investigation because of some new data. And the data was that there were a total of 20 reported cases of a bad type of lymphoma called T cell lymphoma, that occurred in patients who had previously gotten CAR T-cell therapy.

Why is this investigation considered significant?

Dr. Brody: While 20 cases out of 30,000 might seem small, it’s crucial to investigate further to ensure the accuracy of these numbers and determine if there might be another 20 cases that we haven’t heard about yet.

Can you provide insights from a specific case that is being discussed at ASH?

Dr. Brody: It involved a patient with myeloma, not Dlbcl, who got CAR T-cell therapy. And in that case, it sounded very clear that the T cell lymphoma that they got months to a year after the CAR T-cell was because of the CAR T-cell therapy, not just a coincidence.

What are the known risks associated with CAR T-cell therapy?

Dr. Brody: The risks of CAR T-cell therapy we know about, are still probably of greater consequence for our patients than this super rare, but now new and therefore kind of exciting and interesting thing.

How does the risk of T cell lymphoma compare to other potential side effects?

Dr. Brody: If you have lymphoma, you’re probably going to get some therapy one type or another. And all of these therapies have some risks. So this new thing, the T cell lymphoma that developed in some number of people after the CAR T-cell therapy is still proportionally a very small risk compared to these other things.

Should patients alter their plans for CAR T-cell therapy based on this information?

Dr. Brody: So I don’t think that people should have to change their plans or pump the brakes on that plan, but they surely should have the conversation with their oncologist, their lymphoma doctor, as there are different types of monitoring that we should do afterwards just to keep an eye out for this.

Is there any identified higher-risk group for developing T-cell lymphoma?

Dr. Brody: Not that we know of yet.

Why was the occurrence of T-cell lymphoma not entirely unexpected?

Dr. Brody: This side effect was both surprising and should not actually be super surprising. Because CAR T is a type of gene therapy.

How does the risk of T-cell lymphoma compare to other therapy-induced cancers?

Dr. Brody: So it is kind of related. But just again, a pretty rare thing.

What questions should patients be asking about their treatment options?

Dr. Brody: Patients should be asking, you know, what’s right for me specifically. That answer may have been clear five years ago, CAR T-cell was, you know, the immunotherapy now, maybe bispecific antibodies by themselves or maybe bispecific antibodies in combination with some standard therapies.

Can you elaborate on the process of CAR T-cell therapy and its personalized nature?

Dr. Brody: So you sit there on the Leukapheresis machine for maybe four hours, and we get some T cells from that, some of your immune cells, and they send those T cells to one of the manufacturing labs, and they take those T cells and put this gene inside. And the gene is called a car.

CAR T-cell therapy is both immune therapy and gene therapy. We have patients give some blood. It’s a little more than the normal, you know, blood poke in an arm because we do this thing called pheresis or leukapheresis. You give some blood, we keep one part of it and then give you back all the blood so you’re not too drained afterward.

What is the significance of the personalized aspect of CAR T-cell therapy?

Dr. Brody: CAR T-cell therapy is a personalized product made for each person. And then before we re-infuse those CAR T-cells, people get some chemotherapy right beforehand. And that chemotherapy sometimes call it lymphodepleting chemotherapy.


Explore More from Medical Experts


David Miklos, MD



Date: Jan. 2021
Focus: Who benefits from CAR T, ZUMA-2 clinical trial, Stanford's CAR 22 Work
Provider: Stanford Medical

DLBCL Patient Stories

Tony W. feature profile

Tony W., Relapsed T-Cell/Histiocyte-Rich Large B-Cell Lymphoma (T/HRBCL)

Symptoms: A lot of effort needed cycling, body wasn’t responding the same; leg swelling
Treatments: R-CHOP chemotherapy, CAR T-cell therapy
Stephanie Chuang

Stephanie Chuang



Stephanie Chuang, founder of The Patient Story, celebrates five years of being cancer-free. She shares a very personal video diary with the top lessons she learned since the Non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis.

Shahzad B., Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Stage 4



Symptoms: Extreme fatigue
Treatment: R&B, R-ICE, R-EPOCH, CAR T-cell therapy (cell-based gene therapy)
Sammie shares her non-hodgkin's lymphoma story
Sammie F., Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Stage 4
Symptoms: Chest pain, back pain, bump on neck, night sweats Treatment: Chemotherapy, CAR T-Cell therapy
Robyn S. profile

Robyn S., Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Stage 2E



Symptoms: Enlarged lymph nodes
Treatments: Chemotherapy: R-CHOP, R-ICE, intrathecal, BEAM; autologous stem cell transplant, head and neck radiation, CAR T-cell therapy

Richard P., Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma & DLBCL



Relapse Symptoms Swelling in leg, leg edema Treatment: R-CHOP chemotherapy, clinical trial (venetoclax-selinexor)